[OWASP-GUIDE] Frameworks (.NET and J2EE) and Langauage Chapters

Mark Curphey mark at curphey.com
Wed Jan 1 13:05:54 EST 2003

On reflection my vote would be for this approach. I can see the value of
an overview of the security features of the framework itself and then
specifics about web app sec, the asp.net, ado.net etc 

Maybe the question is can (and will) Andrew encapsulate a framework
overview without it becoming a massive prologue so it provides
sufficient information for context. 

Haven't heard any other opinions ;-(

Apurv, how were you planning to tackle J2EE on this angle ?

On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 03:25, Adrian Wiesmann wrote:
> > Absolutely true that ASP.NET is not the whole .NET framework.  My worry
> > here is that we need to maintain a focus on the stuff that will be
> > important to web developers or we risk losing them in a maze of
> > unrelated technologies.
> What I mostly can see with developers is, that many of them are not
> interested in the surrounding technology or even completely in the
> technology they use. So the question which arises for me is if we want to
> tell the developers what they will need to know, or what they want to
> hear. (And what developers we try to reach...)
> Regards and Happy New Year,
> Adrian
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-guide mailing list
> Owasp-guide at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owasp-guide

More information about the Owasp-guide mailing list