[Owasp-cert] Deadlines for August

Matthew Chalmers matthew.chalmers at owasp.org
Thu Jul 24 11:35:30 EDT 2008

I'm not sure what you're trying to ask... Maybe we need a table of pros &
cons? Rank by importance?


On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:02 PM, <james at architectbook.com> wrote:

> Has everyone checked out the document I uploaded to the OWASP site? There
> are several perspectives that exist. One perspective says that Prometric
> makes it convenient for test takers. Another perspective says that the
> financial commitment required by Prometric may not be wise for OWASP to take
> on. Another perspective still says that the US government tends to pay for a
> significant portion of security-oriented exams worldwide and they will not
> consider Prometric exams as they are not ISO 17024 certified. Another
> perspective says that a US centric model doesn't matter to those outside the
> US and maybe they can do Prometric exams, but that makes the economic model
> even harder. An endless loop...
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Owasp-cert] Deadlines for August
> From: "Christian Wenz" <chw at hauser-wenz.de>
> Date: Wed, July 23, 2008 11:21 am
> To: <owasp-cert at lists.owasp.org>
>  Hi,
> I think there is at least one previous step: we need to determine whether
> we use Prometric and/or Pearson VUE or not. If we do (and I support this due
> to the broad availability of the exam), there are specific rules on how to
> write questions, how to categorize them, how many multiple-choice answers to
> use, and so on. What is the current status in that matter?
> Best regards
> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-cert mailing list
> Owasp-cert at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-cert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-cert/attachments/20080724/3a38b6ba/attachment.html 

More information about the Owasp-cert mailing list