[Owasp-board] Disappointment

Tom Brennan - OWASP tomb at owasp.org
Thu Feb 8 15:01:33 UTC 2018

Tara thank you for the investment of your volunteer time. OWASP has grown
to what it is today because of passionate volunteers like you working on
projects, chapters and related efforts around the world that raise
visibility for software security.

FWIW the research approved in December to conduct a feasibility study
(w/3rd party assistance) to collect narrative, and prepare was never an
explicit submission of the proposal. The purpose of the meeting(s) last
night, https://www.owasp.org/index.php/February_7,_2018  **recording
available shortly was to status the project and was for prepared questions
from the BoD on the provided in advance draft.

The request to halt/stand down/stop/do not submit issued by the
Chairman and that's ok.

The entire board and the executive director have now seen a sprint/business
example of what is possible yielding 10M returns annually and how to think
big and improve the visibility for software security, creating jobs and
accelerating innovation. The risk/impact/operations aspects were assessed
and a decision was made by OWASP’s elected officials not to proceed on the
NYC EDC RFP https://www.nycedc.com/opportunity/cyber-nyc-rfp

Having personally been elected by this community and having served on the
board for (10) years it's not an easy extra volunteer job. So I understand
that it was discussed and a majority of elected officials, desired this
action. Now they must stand united by the decisions made regardless.

Historically votes on matters are important to see:

This effort has had *extreme value IMHO* and is a roadmap/stepping stone to
define the 2018+ strategic goals globally and to be cascaded locally by the
membership, projects, and chapters  https://www.owasp.org/index.

Stay tuned for the current elected official's plan for 2018

Semper Fi,

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:21 AM Tara Williams <tarachriswilliams at gmail.com>

> Dear OWASP Board of Directors:
> I am sure your believe your decision to discontinue the RFP to the NYCEDC
> is a wise one.
> In my opinion this is a missed opportunity. I would also submit this
> decision was a political one.
> I look forward to your plans to build on the organization and its
> contributions.  It is a shame that many factors contributed to the lack of
> consensus that this could have been an opportunity to increase OWASP’s good
> and important works for the community.
> I look forward to learning about the initiatives OWASP has in store to
> actually building the organization and revenue-generating models.  At this
> point, thanks to the lack of an annual reports since 2015 and the lack of
> other data one sees with a 501c(3) non profit, there seems to be a mystery
> around the plans to grow this organization and make it more
> diverse/inclusive.
> Also, if the Global BoD thought OWASP was "hitting above its weight" why
> did it give members the green light to proceed with the hiring of a
> consultant to initiate activities related to the RFP in the first place?
> Was it a sound business decision to dedicate funds to this effort if there
> was such reservations in the first place? I would be grateful for some
> logical feedback as to why the BoD would say yes to the initial "ask" and
> then discontinue it.
> This does not sound right/ethical/logical.
> Sincerely,
> Tara Williams
> Contributor to the RFP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20180208/fdca4f90/attachment.html>

More information about the Owasp-board mailing list