[Owasp-board] 2/8 Board meeting notice

Josh Sokol josh.sokol at owasp.org
Fri Feb 3 22:01:06 UTC 2017


I saw that too, but it really falls under "Unfinished Business" according
to that.  It also makes me think that we're using "Old Business" wrong.
According to that, at least, "Old Business"is a matter that's already been
disposed of.  I feel like I'm left with more questions than answers.
Should we rename that section to Old/Unfinished Business maybe?

~josh

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:

> Here is what I could dig up on that with google foo
>
> http://www.roberts-rules.com/parl03.htm
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:50 PM Josh Sokol
> <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> Quick question for clarification sake.  If something was on last month's
>> agenda, under new business, but was tabled due to a lack of time, does that
>> go under "Old Business" or "New Business" relative to this month's
>> meeting?  Thanks!
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> Reminder to the current board, the next board meeting is 2/8 details your
>> attendance is requested
>>
>> Agenda
>>
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/February_8,_2017
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Tom Brennan | **Mobile:* 973-506-9304 <(973)%20506-9304>  *|* *Schedule
>> vMeeting*: Click Here <http://www.meetme.so/tombrennan>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>> --
>
> *Tom Brennan | **Mobile:* 973-506-9304 <(973)%20506-9304>  *|* *Schedule
> vMeeting*: Click Here <http://www.meetme.so/tombrennan>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20170203/6632b778/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list