[Owasp-board] Madrid Protocol Est.
tiffany.long at owasp.org
Thu Sep 1 20:45:40 UTC 2016
We will not be applying for the same marks on the Madrid Protocol so they
are entirely separate. In particular we will be applying for "OWASP" which
is a fantastic name case (meaning we made it up), this is the strongest
case to apply for. The reason we were turned down is that "Open," "Web,"
"Application," "Security," and "Project" are generic terms identified in
the dictionary and used in denotatively correct ways.
If we wish to wait until our copyright is approved (which might require
disclaiming our name) we can.
I should note that copyright is for one color. If we want to include
multiple colors or backgrounds, it will be more.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj at owasp.org>
> Considering that we've been initially turned down in the US, does this
> prevent us applying for a trademark under the Madric protocol?
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Tiffany Long <tiffany.long at owasp.org>
>> Dear Board,
>> To apply for a trade mark in one class through the Madrid Protocol would
>> cost approximately $5,800. One application would cover all 64 of these
>> requested nations. This would be a mark not be in color and would cover
>> the following:
>> 1. The Entire EU
>> 2. The Entire OA (African Intellectual Property)
>> 3. The US
>> 4. China
>> 5. Colombia
>> 6. Curacao (It is possible that this can be included in the
>> Netherlands mark thereby saving 336 Franc)
>> 7. Cyprus
>> 8. UK (should they leave the EU, the price goes down 262 Franc if
>> they stay in)
>> 9. Georgia
>> 10. Isreal
>> 11. India
>> 12. Iran
>> 13. Iceland
>> 14. Japan
>> 15. Korea
>> 16. Morocco
>> 17. Mexico
>> 18. Norway
>> 19. Philippines
>> 20. Russia
>> 21. Turkey
>> Tiffany Long
>> Community Manager
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board