[Owasp-board] Oh no, not again...
laura.grau at owasp.org
Mon Jan 25 20:35:25 UTC 2016
As far as I know there are not rules defined for the Selection Committee at
the Global AppSec Conferences, local teams can invite whoever they want and
use their own system to review and score the submissions.
Call For Papers and Call For Trainings is open to everybody and widely
advertise, so men and women can submit.
OWASP staff do not play any role here other than contacting all the
submitters, after the selection has been made, in order to let them know
whether their presentation has been selected and ask for the required
information to those who have been chosen (bio, headshoot, abstract, signed
Please let me know if you need any further information.
*Global Conference Manager*
*laura.grau at owasp.org* <laura.grau at owasp.org>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>
> All great questions. I'd direct these to Laura, Paul and the Conference
> The conference process does have some rules defined, but a significant
> amount of decision making (in many aspects) is delegated to the local
> planning team.
> Michael Coates | @_mwc <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
> OWASP Global Board
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj at owasp.org>
>> Hi there,
>> I note with frustration that again, despite the absolutely astonishing
>> odds of this occurring, we seem to have ended up with 25 men and 0 women on
>> the papers committee at AppSec EU.
>> I will let that sink in for a second. 25 men. 0 women. 2016.
>> I'm sure all of them are excellent and are doing a good job, but there
>> has to be at least a few women on this planet who could and wanted to help
>> out, if only they had been asked or been in the right place at the right
>> time. I might not be looking at the right place, but where was the
>> announcement to get on the papers committee. It's not on AppSecEU's social
>> media feed. I've searched the most likely mail lists, and nothing. So how
>> did this committee form?
>> What do we have in place to make sure that we:
>> - Do we have a standard way of calling for a papers committee? I
>> don't see any announcement
>> - Ensure that there's at least *some* women representation on any
>> conference's papers committee?
>> - Did we reach out to or invite anyone from the OWASP Women in AppSec
>> group to be on the papers committee?
>> - Do we make sure proposals being vetted by the papers committee are
>> blind (i.e. the gender, name and bio are missing on ALL submissions)?
>> - Do we have a conflict of interest policy for PC members so they
>> can't submit papers or training? I'd hate for a new speaker or someone who
>> normally doesn't speak at OWASP conferences, like developers, have a shot
>> over someone on the PC*.
>> - Do we have a few slots available for new speakers? Do we reach
>> outside the echo chamber to fill these slots, whether by invitation or
>> invitation to submit? There are some awesome speakers at JavaOne and at
>> OSCON and at other conferences. It would be great to get some
>> inter-profession dialog going
>> - Do we reach out to OWASP Women in AppSec to outright invite a
>> keynote or two or ask for speakers to submit?
>> - Do we reach out on social media to ask new and gender diverse
>> speakers to submit?
>> - Do we make sure when the final selection is made that it's not
>> complete wall to wall male presenters?
>> I am looking for answers. I will be watching the results of the paper
>> selection with some interest, as we cannot ever again have a situation
>> where there are no women presenting at our four major global conferences.
>> * Full disclosure: I have put a training submission in for the ASVS at
>> Rome. I am not on the papers committee.
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board