[Owasp-board] OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:

Josh Sokol josh.sokol at owasp.org
Thu Sep 10 14:32:26 UTC 2015


OK, thank you.  I will follow up.

~josh

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Owasp <kate.hartmann at owasp.org> wrote:

> No, you are not missing anything. That is the complete content of the
> case.
>
> Kate Hartmann
>
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 10:45 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> Kate,
>
> When I look at the case from what you forwarded, I only see my messages to
> Christian, not any message from Christian to us.  Am I missing something?
>
> ~josh
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Below is the content of case 00006860
>>
>> Topic:  Report Abuse
>> Contact Name:  Christian Heinrich
>> Web Email:  christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
>> Created:  09/04/2015  6:25 PM
>>
>> __________
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Christian,
>>
>> It was brought to my attention that as a result of the recent blocks, you
>> will be unable to respond via e-mail should you exercise your option for an
>> appeal.  In that case, please use the OWASP Contact Us form located at
>> http://www.tfaforms.com/308703 and it will be routed appropriately.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Josh Sokol
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Christian,
>>
>> As per Section 4.07 of the OWASP Foundation Bylaws, "Participation in
>> OWASP
>> activities (conferences, meetings, mailing lists, projects, etc) does not
>> require membership, but is subject to adherence to the OWASP Code of
>> Ethics
>> and OWASP leaders may revoke the privilege of participation to those who
>> choose not to abide."  Due to repeated perceived violations of the OWASP
>> Code of Ethics, which I outline below, I have invoked section 4.07 of the
>> OWASP Foundation Bylaws and asked to have your privilege to post to the
>> mailing list revoked.  This e-mail shall serve as your official notice of
>> this action with the OWASP Board of Directors cc'd for inclusion in the
>> Foundation records.  Per the Bylaws, if you believe that this revocation is
>> unjustified, you have the option to appeal this decision by notifying the
>> OWASP Board of Directors within 14 days.
>>
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000733.html
>> Two instances of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
>> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "Jim manipulated you and the review process to achieve his desired
>> outcome against Jeff Williams and Aspect Security"
>> "This reminded me of when Sarah Baso attempting to make a clean exit."
>> Two instances of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "Jim manipulated you and the review process to achieve his desired
>> outcome against Jeff Williams and Aspect Security"
>> "This reminded me of when Sarah Baso attempting to make a clean exit."
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000737.html
>> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
>> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "you ulterior motive was to take over nmap with the poor project
>> management practices of your new foundation"
>> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "you ulterior motive was to take over nmap with the poor project
>> management practices of your new foundation"
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000742.html
>> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
>> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "Simon's show of support is to ensure you don't damage his Flagship
>> project again with a "demotion" without any support evidence."
>> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "Simon's show of support is to ensure you don't damage his Flagship
>> project again with a "demotion" without any support evidence."
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000744.html
>> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
>> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "Since you just accepted a grant (for research you didn't contribute)"
>> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "Since you just accepted a grant (for research you didn't contribute)"
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000729.html
>> Two instances of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
>> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "Jim supported the complaint against the OWASP Top Ten 2013 release but
>> then "manipulated"
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php?title=Issues_Concerning_The_OWASP_Top_Ten_2013&diff=0&oldid=153296
>> "
>> "his continued attacks against their flagship projects which have
>> resulted in a significant loss of their reputation"
>> Two instances of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "Jim supported the complaint against the OWASP Top Ten 2013 release but
>> then "manipulated"
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php?title=Issues_Concerning_The_OWASP_Top_Ten_2013&diff=0&oldid=153296
>> "
>> "his continued attacks against their flagship projects which have
>> resulted in a significant loss of their reputation"
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Josh Sokol
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Christian Heinrich
>>
>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Kate or Paul,
>>>
>>> Can you please forward the information from Case # 6860 to the Board?
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> ~josh
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Christian Heinrich <christian.heinrich at live.com>
>>> Date: Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:14 AM
>>> Subject: FW: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>>> To: "josh.sokol at owasp.org" <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>> Cc: "martin.knobloch at owasp.org" <martin.knobloch at owasp.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh,
>>>
>>> I have nominated to the process you refer to as an appeal and will be
>>> available after 2PM on Wednesday or Friday (PDT)?
>>>
>>> This is Thursday or Saturday morning in my timezone (AEST).
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian Heinrich
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:10:05 +1000
>>> Subject: Fwd: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>>> From: christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
>>> To: christian.heinrich at live.com
>>>
>>> Forwarded to christian.heinrich at live.com
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Kate Hartmann* <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>>> Date: Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 8:25 AM
>>> Subject: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>>> To: "christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au" <christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for submitting your question to us online. Case #00006860: ""
>>> has been created and a OWASP Foundation Customer Advocate will respond to
>>> you shortly.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Customer Advocate Team  OWASP Foundation
>>>
>>> ====
>>> Disclaimer: OWASP does not endorse or recommend commercial products or
>>> services allowing our community to remain vendor neutral with the
>>> collective wisdom of the best minds in application security worldwide.
>>> ====
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian Heinrich
>>>
>>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Kate Hartmann
>> kate.hartmann at owasp.org
>> +1 301-275-9403
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150910/b692a671/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list