[Owasp-board] OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:

Owasp kate.hartmann at owasp.org
Thu Sep 10 12:38:46 UTC 2015


No, you are not missing anything. That is the complete content of the case.  

Kate Hartmann

> On Sep 9, 2015, at 10:45 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
> 
> Kate,
> 
> When I look at the case from what you forwarded, I only see my messages to Christian, not any message from Christian to us.  Am I missing something?
> 
> ~josh
> 
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Below is the content of case 00006860 
>> 
>> Topic:  Report Abuse
>> Contact Name:  Christian Heinrich
>> Web Email:  christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
>> Created:  09/04/2015  6:25 PM
>> 
>> __________
>> 
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Christian,
>> 
>> It was brought to my attention that as a result of the recent blocks, you will be unable to respond via e-mail should you exercise your option for an appeal.  In that case, please use the OWASP Contact Us form located at http://www.tfaforms.com/308703 and it will be routed appropriately. Thank you.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Josh Sokol
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Christian,
>> 
>> As per Section 4.07 of the OWASP Foundation Bylaws, "Participation in OWASP
>> activities (conferences, meetings, mailing lists, projects, etc) does not
>> require membership, but is subject to adherence to the OWASP Code of Ethics
>> and OWASP leaders may revoke the privilege of participation to those who
>> choose not to abide."  Due to repeated perceived violations of the OWASP Code of Ethics, which I outline below, I have invoked section 4.07 of the OWASP Foundation Bylaws and asked to have your privilege to post to the mailing list revoked.  This e-mail shall serve as your official notice of this action with the OWASP Board of Directors cc'd for inclusion in the Foundation records.  Per the Bylaws, if you believe that this revocation is unjustified, you have the option to appeal this decision by notifying the OWASP Board of Directors within 14 days.
>> 
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000733.html
>> Two instances of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "Jim manipulated you and the review process to achieve his desired outcome against Jeff Williams and Aspect Security"
>> "This reminded me of when Sarah Baso attempting to make a clean exit."
>> Two instances of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "Jim manipulated you and the review process to achieve his desired outcome against Jeff Williams and Aspect Security"
>> "This reminded me of when Sarah Baso attempting to make a clean exit."
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000737.html
>> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "you ulterior motive was to take over nmap with the poor project management practices of your new foundation"
>> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "you ulterior motive was to take over nmap with the poor project management practices of your new foundation"
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000742.html
>> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "Simon's show of support is to ensure you don't damage his Flagship project again with a "demotion" without any support evidence."
>> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "Simon's show of support is to ensure you don't damage his Flagship project again with a "demotion" without any support evidence."
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000744.html
>> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "Since you just accepted a grant (for research you didn't contribute)"
>> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "Since you just accepted a grant (for research you didn't contribute)"
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000729.html
>> Two instances of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
>> "Jim supported the complaint against the OWASP Top Ten 2013 release but then "manipulated" https://www.owasp.org/index.php?title=Issues_Concerning_The_OWASP_Top_Ten_2013&diff=0&oldid=153296"
>> "his continued attacks against their flagship projects which have resulted in a significant loss of their reputation"
>> Two instances of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
>> "Jim supported the complaint against the OWASP Top Ten 2013 release but then "manipulated" https://www.owasp.org/index.php?title=Issues_Concerning_The_OWASP_Top_Ten_2013&diff=0&oldid=153296"
>> "his continued attacks against their flagship projects which have resulted in a significant loss of their reputation"
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Josh Sokol
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Christian Heinrich
>> 
>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact
>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> Kate or Paul,
>>> 
>>> Can you please forward the information from Case # 6860 to the Board?  Thank you.
>>> 
>>> ~josh
>>> 
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Christian Heinrich <christian.heinrich at live.com>
>>> Date: Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:14 AM
>>> Subject: FW: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>>> To: "josh.sokol at owasp.org" <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>> Cc: "martin.knobloch at owasp.org" <martin.knobloch at owasp.org>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Josh,
>>> 
>>> I have nominated to the process you refer to as an appeal and will be available after 2PM on Wednesday or Friday (PDT)?
>>> 
>>> This is Thursday or Saturday morning in my timezone (AEST).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian Heinrich
>>> 
>>> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:10:05 +1000
>>> Subject: Fwd: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>>> From: christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
>>> To: christian.heinrich at live.com
>>> 
>>> Forwarded to christian.heinrich at live.com
>>> 
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>>> Date: Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 8:25 AM
>>> Subject: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>>> To: "christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au" <christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you for submitting your question to us online. Case #00006860: "" has been created and a OWASP Foundation Customer Advocate will respond to you shortly.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Customer Advocate Team  OWASP Foundation
>>> 
>>> ====
>>> Disclaimer: OWASP does not endorse or recommend commercial products or services allowing our community to remain vendor neutral with the collective wisdom of the best minds in application security worldwide.
>>> ====
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian Heinrich
>>> 
>>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> Kate Hartmann
>> kate.hartmann at owasp.org
>> +1 301-275-9403
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150910/5fc73bdf/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list