[Owasp-board] FW: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:

Josh Sokol josh.sokol at owasp.org
Thu Sep 10 02:45:28 UTC 2015


Kate,

When I look at the case from what you forwarded, I only see my messages to
Christian, not any message from Christian to us.  Am I missing something?

~josh

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Kate Hartmann <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
wrote:

> Below is the content of case 00006860
>
> Topic:  Report Abuse
> Contact Name:  Christian Heinrich
> Web Email:  christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
> Created:  09/04/2015  6:25 PM
>
> __________
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
> Christian,
>
> It was brought to my attention that as a result of the recent blocks, you
> will be unable to respond via e-mail should you exercise your option for an
> appeal.  In that case, please use the OWASP Contact Us form located at
> http://www.tfaforms.com/308703 and it will be routed appropriately. Thank
> you.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Josh Sokol
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
> Christian,
>
> As per Section 4.07 of the OWASP Foundation Bylaws, "Participation in OWASP
> activities (conferences, meetings, mailing lists, projects, etc) does not
> require membership, but is subject to adherence to the OWASP Code of Ethics
> and OWASP leaders may revoke the privilege of participation to those who
> choose not to abide."  Due to repeated perceived violations of the OWASP
> Code of Ethics, which I outline below, I have invoked section 4.07 of the
> OWASP Foundation Bylaws and asked to have your privilege to post to the
> mailing list revoked.  This e-mail shall serve as your official notice of
> this action with the OWASP Board of Directors cc'd for inclusion in the
> Foundation records.  Per the Bylaws, if you believe that this revocation is
> unjustified, you have the option to appeal this decision by notifying the
> OWASP Board of Directors within 14 days.
>
> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000733.html
> Two instances of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
> "Jim manipulated you and the review process to achieve his desired outcome
> against Jeff Williams and Aspect Security"
> "This reminded me of when Sarah Baso attempting to make a clean exit."
> Two instances of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
> "Jim manipulated you and the review process to achieve his desired outcome
> against Jeff Williams and Aspect Security"
> "This reminded me of when Sarah Baso attempting to make a clean exit."
> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000737.html
> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
> "you ulterior motive was to take over nmap with the poor project
> management practices of your new foundation"
> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
> "you ulterior motive was to take over nmap with the poor project
> management practices of your new foundation"
> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000742.html
> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
> "Simon's show of support is to ensure you don't damage his Flagship
> project again with a "demotion" without any support evidence."
> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
> "Simon's show of support is to ensure you don't damage his Flagship
> project again with a "demotion" without any support evidence."
> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000744.html
> One instance of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
> "Since you just accepted a grant (for research you didn't contribute)"
> One instance of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
> "Since you just accepted a grant (for research you didn't contribute)"
> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/governance/2015-September/000729.html
> Two instances of violation of "Not intentionally injure or impugn the
> professional reputation of practice of colleagues, clients, or employers"
> "Jim supported the complaint against the OWASP Top Ten 2013 release but
> then "manipulated"
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php?title=Issues_Concerning_The_OWASP_Top_Ten_2013&diff=0&oldid=153296
> "
> "his continued attacks against their flagship projects which have resulted
> in a significant loss of their reputation"
> Two instances of failure to "Treat everyone with respect and dignity"
> "Jim supported the complaint against the OWASP Top Ten 2013 release but
> then "manipulated"
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php?title=Issues_Concerning_The_OWASP_Top_Ten_2013&diff=0&oldid=153296
> "
> "his continued attacks against their flagship projects which have resulted
> in a significant loss of their reputation"
> Sincerely,
>
> Josh Sokol
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Christian Heinrich
>
> http://cmlh.id.au/contact
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Kate or Paul,
>>
>> Can you please forward the information from Case # 6860 to the Board?
>> Thank you.
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Christian Heinrich <christian.heinrich at live.com>
>> Date: Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:14 AM
>> Subject: FW: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>> To: "josh.sokol at owasp.org" <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>> Cc: "martin.knobloch at owasp.org" <martin.knobloch at owasp.org>
>>
>>
>> Josh,
>>
>> I have nominated to the process you refer to as an appeal and will be
>> available after 2PM on Wednesday or Friday (PDT)?
>>
>> This is Thursday or Saturday morning in my timezone (AEST).
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian Heinrich
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:10:05 +1000
>> Subject: Fwd: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>> From: christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au
>> To: christian.heinrich at live.com
>>
>> Forwarded to christian.heinrich at live.com
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *Kate Hartmann* <kate.hartmann at owasp.org>
>> Date: Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 8:25 AM
>> Subject: OWASP Foundation Case # 00006860:
>> To: "christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au" <christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for submitting your question to us online. Case #00006860: ""
>> has been created and a OWASP Foundation Customer Advocate will respond to
>> you shortly.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Customer Advocate Team  OWASP Foundation
>>
>> ====
>> Disclaimer: OWASP does not endorse or recommend commercial products or
>> services allowing our community to remain vendor neutral with the
>> collective wisdom of the best minds in application security worldwide.
>> ====
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Christian Heinrich
>>
>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Kate Hartmann
> kate.hartmann at owasp.org
> +1 301-275-9403
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150909/3bbef182/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list