[Owasp-board] We need to Lead definition of Active Leader

Noreen Whysel noreen.whysel at owasp.org
Mon Oct 19 15:51:26 UTC 2015


Here are the links to these chapters:

Active Chapter Definition:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Chapter_Handbook/Chapter_2:_Mandatory_Chapter_Rules

Active Chapter Leader Definition:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Chapter_Handbook/Chapter_5:_Governance

The definitions could go before the Contact Us section here:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Chapter_Handbook/Chapter_1:_Handbook_Overview

Noreen Whysel
Community Manager
OWASP Foundation

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Noreen Whysel <noreen.whysel at owasp.org>
wrote:

> I have added my definition of Active Chapter to the lead paragraph of
> Chapter 2 of the Chapter Leader Handbook.
>
> I have added the definition of an Active Leader to the first bullet under
> 5.1 Leadership in Chapter 5 of the Chapter Leader Handbook.
>
> Any references to Active Chapter or Active Chapter Leader should link to
> these definitions.
>
> Alternatively (or in addition), we could put a section on Definitions in
> Chapter 1: Handbook Overview.
>
> Noreen Whysel
> Community Manager
> OWASP Foundation
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Noreen Whysel <noreen.whysel at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok. Just a clarification. Since chapter leaders can't update SF it can't
>> be part of the requirement. Wiki page and Mailman admin is all they need.
>>
>> ;)
>>
>> Noreen Whysel
>> Community Manager
>> OWASP Foundation
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Paul Ritchie <paul.ritchie at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, good feedback.
>>
>> Notice locations - In addition to buried in handbook, I think the second
>> highest priority would be to highlight that definition on a chapter
>> homepage.    More then that is to many places.
>>
>> 2 meetings before $500....No, I was just trying to stimulate the thought
>> process.  Board did comment that they thought a first meeting would be
>> needed anyway to generate a second leader.
>> So....if you and want to make this decision NOW....I'm OK with   1)
>> complete all your 'normal' new chapter paperwork, plus 2) must have a
>> second leader officially named on wiki and SF database.
>>
>> 3.  Re Ghana - I will expect all staff to 'hold the line'   $500 is
>> designed as an incentive to "be active" 'get shared' leadership and 'be
>> responsive.    If there is no update....there is no money.    If he is
>> responsive and meets requirements....wow = incentive money.
>> I imagine there may be several of these....either not responsive, or
>> can't find that 2nd leader.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> Best Regards, Paul Ritchie
>> OWASP Executive Director
>> paul.ritchie at owasp.org
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Noreen Whysel OWASP <
>> noreen.whysel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Q1 chapter handbook under governance chapter only. Everywhere else we
>>> mention active leaders can link to that section but o don't think it is
>>> wise to have it all over the place in case it changes over time. Projects
>>> handbook probably has a place that makes sense where it discusses leaders.
>>>
>>> Implementation:
>>> -notice to leader list and next news flash
>>> -email alert to all leaders (same list as the monthly finding
>>> announcement) and include info on how to make sure all your leaders are on
>>> the Owasp-leaders list by adding them to Mailman admin field.
>>> -edit new leader welcome and Chapter Active? Templates on SF.
>>> -personal email to any leader who has discussed upcoming events or
>>> funding requirements.
>>> -probably should do a joint hangout with Tobias and a 24/7 Podcast to
>>> discuss the proposals and what it means for chapter and project leaders
>>> when the votes are complete.
>>>
>>> Q2 So chapters would be required to go out of pocket or find a local
>>> sponsor for two meetings before they can get funding? Is this a new
>>> addition that the board came up with or just something we are knocking
>>> around on staff? I think this would be prohibitive in some areas. It's
>>> a bit Catch 22. I fear that a sponsor would want to know that a chapter is
>>> a going concern before putting out funds. At the same time a new chapter
>>> leader is only going to put himself out of he knows he has foundation
>>> funding to host a successful meeting and draw attendance.
>>>
>>> Btw at present Ghana would not qualify for funding because he hasn't
>>> updated the wiki in two years. I have told him that he needs to do it but
>>> his response is sort of Yeah, Yeah or no response. That worries me
>>> particularly since he is asking me to help find speakers.
>>>
>>> Noreen Whysel
>>> Community Manager
>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>
>>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Paul Ritchie <paul.ritchie at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi....OK, if thats the jist of it and it covers the Johanna comments per
>>> Josh's email...that I'm good.
>>>
>>> The next step is cutting and pasting this into our 'official
>>> communication' about these changes to the community.   Sharing that draft
>>> implementation plan at least internally with staff, getting consensus on
>>> timeline and then launching.
>>>
>>> A few, like proposal #4 allow the $500 to be allocated at any NEW
>>> Chapter, *effective immediately*, once it completes all its new chapter
>>> tasks and has 2 Active leaders.
>>>
>>> Q1  Have you considered where and when you would post this new
>>> information on the wiki?  Chapter handbook is fine, but other
>>> locations....and then your timeline to complete, ie. how will you
>>> implement?  is the basis of my question.
>>>
>>> Q2..Must a new Chapter hold its first meeting, or perhaps 2 meetings to
>>> qualify for the "new chapter funds?
>>> Or, for proposal #4,  is our implementation plan to ensure they meet the
>>> minimum requirement of 2 leaders defined, and then all normal new Chapter
>>> information documented in Wiki and Sales force...without needing a
>>> requirement for a 1st meeting.
>>>
>>> Net net Noreen, I will be documenting and drafting up the implementation
>>> project on the budgeting proposals,
>>>
>>> I was looking to have you lead the implementation of the new chapter
>>> funding communication & rules...aligned with Claudia re: new projects.
>>>
>>> Of course, I'm totally open to more ideas if you have some other ideas
>>> on How best to define & communicate 'what was just approved' and how we
>>> will implement?   It just needs to get done and I want to confirm owners
>>> for each portion of work effort.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards, Paul Ritchie
>>> OWASP Executive Director
>>> paul.ritchie at owasp.org
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Noreen Whysel OWASP <
>>> noreen.whysel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My impression is that the board is satisfied with my definition of an
>>>> active leader. Is there something missing from your POV from these two
>>>> requirements:
>>>>
>>>> -Must have contact information clearly accessible from
>>>> chapter/project/initiative page.
>>>> -Must be responsive to inquiries (i.e. Reply within 7 business days)
>>>>
>>>> Noreen Whysel
>>>> Community Manager
>>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Paul Ritchie <paul.ritchie at owasp.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Noreen - I see your email below but all my impressions are that the
>>>> BoD is expected us on Staff to "lead" this discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Fabio isn't going to do it....and since 'we' will be implementing and
>>>> answering all chapter level questions, than WE , and by functional
>>>> responsibility....You, are the one to summarize responses and propose final
>>>> definition of Active Leader.
>>>>
>>>> Can you do that Monday or Tuesday at the latest.
>>>> Basically send out the preferred definition, as a draft, that would
>>>> allow you or me to make a pretty clear decision if the leader is
>>>> Active...with a minimum of potential dispute.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Noreen Whysel*
>>>> *5:16 am (1 day ago)*
>>>> *to Fabio, OWASP *
>>>> *I have given my suggestions. When you have agreed on a final
>>>> definition I will incorporate it into the Chapter Leader Handbook. *
>>>>
>>>> *It is also important to consider Claudia and Johanna's definition of
>>>> an active project and active project leader. I presume it is similar, ie,
>>>> meets minimum requirements/responsive, but not sure if different levels of
>>>> projects would have different requirements.*
>>>> *Noreen *
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards, Paul Ritchie
>>>> OWASP Executive Director
>>>> paul.ritchie at owasp.org
>>>> BAsic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151019/127e072d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list