[Owasp-board] Motion to approve Proposal 6

Tobias tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
Fri Oct 16 20:23:23 UTC 2015


Josh,
we did not table this item during the meeting for the purpose to go 
directly to voting. Otherwise we could have done so immediately. My 
understanding was that more discussion was needed on this at our next 
meeting in 3 weeks.
Best regards, Tobias


On 16/10/15 21:50, Josh Sokol wrote:
> Since this item was tabled and not voted on at the Board meeting, 
> since there does not seem to be a unanimous consensus on how this 
> proposal should work, and since the motion has already been made and 
> seconded (with two votes in favor), I would ask that all Board members 
> record their votes in this e-mail thread.  Thank you.
>
> ~josh
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org 
> <mailto:tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>     I can not see a point in voting now via email, if the next board
>     meeting is within a day.
>     This is a waste of time.
>     Best regards, Tobias
>
>     Ps.: Even though I agree with the overall idea, I feel like
>     several concerns on this have been ignored resulting in a bad
>     proposal. I will likely need to vote no and motion for an
>     alternative text.
>
>
>     On 14/10/15 03:30, Jim Manico wrote:
>>     I vote yes.
>>
>>     --
>>     Jim Manico
>>     Global Board Member
>>     OWASP Foundation
>>     https://www.owasp.org <https://www.owasp.org/>
>>     Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>
>>     On Oct 14, 2015, at 3:06 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org
>>     <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>>     I believe that we've already had the discussion.  Unless there
>>>     is anything new that someone would like to add, I would like to
>>>     request a vote.  I will vote "Yes".
>>>
>>>     ~josh
>>>
>>>     On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Jim Manico
>>>     <jim.manico at owasp.org <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         I second this motion.
>>>
>>>         --
>>>         Jim Manico
>>>         Global Board Member
>>>         OWASP Foundation
>>>         https://www.owasp.org <https://www.owasp.org/>
>>>         Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>>
>>>         On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:36 AM, Josh Sokol
>>>         <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>         I would like to motion that we approve Proposal 6 of the
>>>>         funding proposal presented at the last Board meeting:
>>>>
>>>>         If a request for funding has been approved for one chapter
>>>>         or project, then it can be considered an acceptable expense
>>>>         for all chapters or projects.  If they have an account
>>>>         balance which covers that expense in full, then they should
>>>>         be considered pre-approved for spending.
>>>>
>>>>         Second?
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>         Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>         <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>         https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Owasp-board mailing list
>>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org  <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151016/d66e6a80/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list