[Owasp-board] Motion to approve Proposal 4

Tobias tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
Wed Oct 14 20:41:52 UTC 2015


I agree with Andrew.
Best regards, Tobias


On 14/10/15 15:22, Andrew van der Stock wrote:
> Since there's so much confusion around proposals 3 and 4, let's just 
> nut it out tomorrow. I am not sure my concerns have been dealt with 
> any revised text.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org 
> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>     Seconded.
>
>
>     On 10/14/15 6:52 AM, Josh Sokol wrote:
>>     Crap.  I'm not sure what happened, but Proposal 4 got swapped
>>     somehow when I was reading Tobias' comments.  The actual proposal
>>     #4 is:
>>     *
>>     Upon creation of a new project or chapter, as long as they have
>>     at least two active leaders they will be allocated a $500 budget
>>     to begin with.*
>>
>>     Second?
>>
>>     On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Matt Konda
>>     <matt.konda at owasp.org <mailto:matt.konda at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         This formalizes what was a discussion into a vote.  I vote
>>         yes.  (Jim and Josh also voted yes)
>>
>>         Two previous "no" votes (Andrew and Fabio) are tracked but
>>         italicized since they were given during the discussion period
>>         not the formal voting.
>>
>>         Matt
>>
>>
>>         On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Jim Manico
>>         <jim.manico at owasp.org <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>             I vote yes.
>>
>>             --
>>             Jim Manico
>>             Global Board Member
>>             OWASP Foundation
>>             https://www.owasp.org <https://www.owasp.org/>
>>             Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>
>>             On Oct 14, 2015, at 3:06 AM, Josh Sokol
>>             <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>>             I believe that we've already had the discussion.  Unless
>>>             there is anything new that someone would like to add, I
>>>             would like to request a vote.  I will vote "Yes".
>>>
>>>             ~josh
>>>
>>>             On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jim Manico
>>>             <jim.manico at owasp.org <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 I second the motion.
>>>
>>>                 --
>>>                 Jim Manico
>>>                 Global Board Member
>>>                 OWASP Foundation
>>>                 https://www.owasp.org
>>>                 Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>>
>>>                 On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:52 AM, Josh Sokol
>>>                 <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>>
>>>                 wrote:
>>>
>>>>                 Second?
>>>>
>>>>                 ~josh
>>>>
>>>>                 On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Josh Sokol
>>>>                 <josh.sokol at owasp.org
>>>>                 <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                     Proposal 4 is as follows:
>>>>
>>>>                     All accounts belonging to active chapters and
>>>>                     projects, as defined in the Chapter and Project
>>>>                     Handbooks respectively, with balances less than
>>>>                     $500, will be brought to $500 beginning January
>>>>                     1, 2016 as long as there are at least two
>>>>                     active leaders, as defined in the Chapter and
>>>>                     Project Handbooks, at that time.
>>>>
>>>>                     I added "as defined in the Chapter and Project
>>>>                     Handbooks" to help clarify. It sounds like
>>>>                     Noreen already has a firm grasp on what this
>>>>                     means so I would just ask that the Handbooks
>>>>                     are updated to include a definition/requirements.
>>>>
>>>>                     ~josh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>>                 Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>                 Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>                 <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>                 https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Owasp-board mailing list
>>             Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>             <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>             https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>>
>
>     -- 
>     Jim Manico
>     Global Board Member
>     OWASP Foundation
>     https://www.owasp.org
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Owasp-board mailing list
>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151014/6d184f93/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list