[Owasp-board] Motion to approve proposal 10

Tobias tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
Wed Oct 14 20:32:32 UTC 2015


As the text was modified, I will call again for a vote on the revised text.
It might be more efficient to vote on this during the in-person board 
meeting.
Best regards, Tobias



On 14/10/15 07:10, Jim Manico wrote:
> I second this assuming that is the correct next step.
> - Jim
>
> On 10/14/15 6:40 AM, Josh Sokol wrote:
>> This is a great catch Fabio.  This was intended to cover both 
>> chapters and projects.  I would like to recommend revising it to read:
>>
>> *Accounts with a balance of $5,000 or more as of December 1,
>> with no proposed budget for spending their funds, will be contacted 
>> by the OWASP staff directly to review their account balance. The 
>> chapteror project will be required to create a budget to allocate the 
>> funds for the upcoming year.  Unbudgeted funds may be diverted to 
>> other project(s), chapter(s), or Community Engagement Funding 
>> accounts if the chapter cannot be contacted or a budget is not 
>> received prior to January 1.
>>
>> *
>> To summarize, I added "or project" to the sentence about requiring a 
>> budget to be created.
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Fabio Cerullo <fcerullo at owasp.org 
>> <mailto:fcerullo at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Does this apply to chapters only or projects as well?
>>
>>     Based on the wording it only affects chapters.
>>
>>     Fabio Cerullo
>>     Global Board Member
>>     OWASP Foundation
>>     https://www.owasp.org
>>
>>>     On 13 Oct 2015, at 7:25 a.m., Michael Coates
>>>     <michael.coates at owasp.org <mailto:michael.coates at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I support this. Yes.
>>>
>>>     On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Matt Konda <matt.konda at owasp.org
>>>     <mailto:matt.konda at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>     I vote yes on #10.
>>>>
>>>>     That makes it Josh, Jim, Andrew and I that are "Yes".
>>>>
>>>>     Need to hear from Michael, Fabio and Tobias.
>>>>
>>>>     Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Andrew van der Stock
>>>>     <vanderaj at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         I vote yes to this proposal
>>>>
>>>>         Andrew
>>>>
>>>>         On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Jim Manico
>>>>         <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Seconded
>>>>
>>>>             --
>>>>             Jim Manico
>>>>             Global Board Member
>>>>             OWASP Foundation
>>>>             https://www.owasp.org
>>>>             Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>>>>
>>>>             On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:12 AM, Josh Sokol
>>>>             <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>             I would like to motion that we approve proposal 10 of
>>>>>             the funding initiative discussed at the last Board
>>>>>             meeting.  The exact wording is as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>>             *Accounts with a balance of $5,000 or more as of
>>>>>             December 1,
>>>>>             with no proposed budget for spending their funds, will
>>>>>             be contacted by the OWASP staff directly to review
>>>>>             their account balance. The chapter will be required to
>>>>>             create a budget to allocate the funds for the upcoming
>>>>>             year. Unbudgeted funds may be diverted to other
>>>>>             project(s), chapter(s), or Community Engagement
>>>>>             Funding accounts if the chapter cannot be contacted or
>>>>>             a budget is not received prior to January 1.*
>>>>>
>>>>>             Do I hear a second?
>>>>>
>>>>>             ~josh
>>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>>             Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>             Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>             https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>             Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>             Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>             https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>         Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>         <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>         https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Owasp-board mailing list
>>>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Owasp-board mailing list
>>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
> -- 
> Jim Manico
> Global Board Member
> OWASP Foundation
> https://www.owasp.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151014/3bc65bf0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list