[Owasp-board] Motion to approve Proposal 4

Andrew van der Stock vanderaj at owasp.org
Wed Oct 14 13:22:41 UTC 2015


Since there's so much confusion around proposals 3 and 4, let's just nut it
out tomorrow. I am not sure my concerns have been dealt with any revised
text.

Andrew

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:

> Seconded.
>
>
> On 10/14/15 6:52 AM, Josh Sokol wrote:
>
> Crap.  I'm not sure what happened, but Proposal 4 got swapped somehow when
> I was reading Tobias' comments.  The actual proposal #4 is:
>
> * Upon creation of a new project or chapter, as long as they have at least
> two active leaders they will be allocated a $500 budget to begin with.*
>
> Second?
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Matt Konda <matt.konda at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> This formalizes what was a discussion into a vote.  I vote yes.  (Jim and
>> Josh also voted yes)
>>
>> Two previous "no" votes (Andrew and Fabio) are tracked but italicized
>> since they were given during the discussion period not the formal voting.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Jim Manico < <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>> jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I vote yes.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Manico
>>> Global Board Member
>>> OWASP Foundation
>>> https://www.owasp.org
>>> Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 3:06 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe that we've already had the discussion.  Unless there is
>>> anything new that someone would like to add, I would like to request a
>>> vote.  I will vote "Yes".
>>>
>>> ~josh
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jim Manico < <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>>> jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I second the motion.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jim Manico
>>>> Global Board Member
>>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>> <https://www.owasp.org/>https://www.owasp.org
>>>> Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:52 AM, Josh Sokol < <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>>> josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Second?
>>>>
>>>> ~josh
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Josh Sokol < <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>>> josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Proposal 4 is as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> All accounts belonging to active chapters and projects, as defined in
>>>>> the Chapter and Project Handbooks respectively, with balances less than
>>>>> $500, will be brought to $500 beginning January 1, 2016 as long as there
>>>>> are at least two active leaders, as defined in the Chapter and Project
>>>>> Handbooks, at that time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I added "as defined in the Chapter and Project Handbooks" to help
>>>>> clarify.  It sounds like Noreen already has a firm grasp on what this means
>>>>> so I would just ask that the Handbooks are updated to include a
>>>>> definition/requirements.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>> <Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>> <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board>
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jim Manico
> Global Board Member
> OWASP Foundationhttps://www.owasp.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151015/08494ab2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list