[Owasp-board] Motion to approve Proposal 4

Jim Manico jim.manico at owasp.org
Wed Oct 14 05:10:40 UTC 2015


Seconded.

On 10/14/15 6:52 AM, Josh Sokol wrote:
> Crap.  I'm not sure what happened, but Proposal 4 got swapped somehow 
> when I was reading Tobias' comments.  The actual proposal #4 is:
> *
> Upon creation of a new project or chapter, as long as they have at 
> least two active leaders they will be allocated a $500 budget to begin 
> with.*
>
> Second?
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Matt Konda <matt.konda at owasp.org 
> <mailto:matt.konda at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>     This formalizes what was a discussion into a vote.  I vote yes.
>      (Jim and Josh also voted yes)
>
>     Two previous "no" votes (Andrew and Fabio) are tracked but
>     italicized since they were given during the discussion period not
>     the formal voting.
>
>     Matt
>
>
>     On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org
>     <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>         I vote yes.
>
>         --
>         Jim Manico
>         Global Board Member
>         OWASP Foundation
>         https://www.owasp.org <https://www.owasp.org/>
>         Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>
>         On Oct 14, 2015, at 3:06 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org
>         <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>>         I believe that we've already had the discussion.  Unless
>>         there is anything new that someone would like to add, I would
>>         like to request a vote.  I will vote "Yes".
>>
>>         ~josh
>>
>>         On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jim Manico
>>         <jim.manico at owasp.org <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>             I second the motion.
>>
>>             --
>>             Jim Manico
>>             Global Board Member
>>             OWASP Foundation
>>             https://www.owasp.org <https://www.owasp.org/>
>>             Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>
>>             On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:52 AM, Josh Sokol
>>             <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>>             Second?
>>>
>>>             ~josh
>>>
>>>             On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Josh Sokol
>>>             <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Proposal 4 is as follows:
>>>
>>>                 All accounts belonging to active chapters and
>>>                 projects, as defined in the Chapter and Project
>>>                 Handbooks respectively, with balances less than
>>>                 $500, will be brought to $500 beginning January 1,
>>>                 2016 as long as there are at least two active
>>>                 leaders, as defined in the Chapter and Project
>>>                 Handbooks, at that time.
>>>
>>>                 I added "as defined in the Chapter and Project
>>>                 Handbooks" to help clarify. It sounds like Noreen
>>>                 already has a firm grasp on what this means so I
>>>                 would just ask that the Handbooks are updated to
>>>                 include a definition/requirements.
>>>
>>>                 ~josh
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             Owasp-board mailing list
>>>             Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>             <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>             https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Owasp-board mailing list
>         Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>         https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
>

-- 
Jim Manico
Global Board Member
OWASP Foundation
https://www.owasp.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151014/2e58ad78/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list