[Owasp-board] Motion to approve Proposal 4

Josh Sokol josh.sokol at owasp.org
Wed Oct 14 04:52:01 UTC 2015


Crap.  I'm not sure what happened, but Proposal 4 got swapped somehow when
I was reading Tobias' comments.  The actual proposal #4 is:

* Upon creation of a new project or chapter, as long as they have at least
two active leaders they will be allocated a $500 budget to begin with.*

Second?

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Matt Konda <matt.konda at owasp.org> wrote:

> This formalizes what was a discussion into a vote.  I vote yes.  (Jim and
> Josh also voted yes)
>
> Two previous "no" votes (Andrew and Fabio) are tracked but italicized
> since they were given during the discussion period not the formal voting.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> I vote yes.
>>
>> --
>> Jim Manico
>> Global Board Member
>> OWASP Foundation
>> https://www.owasp.org
>> Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 3:06 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> I believe that we've already had the discussion.  Unless there is
>> anything new that someone would like to add, I would like to request a
>> vote.  I will vote "Yes".
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I second the motion.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Manico
>>> Global Board Member
>>> OWASP Foundation
>>> https://www.owasp.org
>>> Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:52 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Second?
>>>
>>> ~josh
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Proposal 4 is as follows:
>>>>
>>>> All accounts belonging to active chapters and projects, as defined in
>>>> the Chapter and Project Handbooks respectively, with balances less than
>>>> $500, will be brought to $500 beginning January 1, 2016 as long as there
>>>> are at least two active leaders, as defined in the Chapter and Project
>>>> Handbooks, at that time.
>>>>
>>>> I added "as defined in the Chapter and Project Handbooks" to help
>>>> clarify.  It sounds like Noreen already has a firm grasp on what this means
>>>> so I would just ask that the Handbooks are updated to include a
>>>> definition/requirements.
>>>>
>>>> ~josh
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151013/c4b0de88/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list