[Owasp-board] Motion to approve proposal 3

Matt Konda matt.konda at owasp.org
Wed Oct 14 03:46:13 UTC 2015


Fabio,

Noted.  Thanks.

Matt


On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Fabio Cerullo <fcerullo at owasp.org> wrote:

> Without a clear definition of what an ‘active’ leader is I would vote NO.
>
> We are trying to solve an issue here where volunteers could get access to
> funding.
>
> Establishing non clear requirements will make life difficult for
> volunteers and Operations.
>
> Fabio Cerullo
> Global Board Member
> OWASP Foundation
> https://www.owasp.org
>
> On 13 Oct 2015, at 2:58 a.m., Matt Konda <matt.konda at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> I vote yes for #3.
>
> We have Jim, Michael, Andrew, Matt, Josh and Tobias in favor based on this
> thread.
>
> Awaiting input from Fabio.
>
> Matt
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Noreen Whysel <noreen.whysel at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Proposed Definitions for chapter leader handbook:
>>
>> Active Chapter: An active chapter is one that meets the minimum
>> requirements outlined in Chapter 2 of the Chapter Leader Handbook. Chapters
>> that do not meet minimum requirements will be marked inactive and will not
>> be eligible for Community Engagement funding.
>>
>> Active Chapter Leader: An active chapter leader is a person whose name is
>> listed on the chapter wiki page and is included on the administrator list
>> of the chapter Mailman list. Active chapter leaders must be responsive to
>> the Community and the Foundation via email or other correspondence.
>>
>> Addition for discussion:
>>
>> If, after a reasonable amount of time, a chapter leader has not responded
>> to inquiries via their contact email and the chapter Mailman list, the
>> Foundation reserves the right to grant leadership status to a new
>> volunteer.
>>
>> Noreen Whysel
>> Community Manager
>> OWASP Foundation
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Noreen,
>>
>> thank you very much for pointing that out.
>> Could you prepare a description for what would be a definition you think
>> makes sense, for next Wednesday?
>>
>> @Josh: I think we (our operations team and possibly us) need to be clear
>> on that answer for this proposal to work properly.  Otherwise, we will make
>> it ambiguous/unclear and hard  to implement for our team.
>>
>> Best, Tobias
>>
>>
>> On 11/10/15 19:08, Josh Sokol wrote:
>>
>> I agree 100%.  Is that something that you can work on updating for us,
>> Noreen?  It sounds like you have a well thought out process already.  It
>> just needs to be documented in the proper place.  Thank you!
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Noreen Whysel <noreen.whysel at owasp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding this proposal, there will need to be a corresponding
>>> definition of active in the handbooks. Right now there is only an implied
>>> definition that an active chapter is one that fulfills minimum
>>> requirements. This is not stated explicitly. There is a line in Chapter 2
>>> that say is at least 4 chapter meetings per year is "recommended" to be
>>> considered active.
>>>
>>> In my audits, the decision to inactivate a chapter is discretionary, not
>>> prescriptive: Preceding the decision to mark a chapter as inactive, I look
>>> to see if minimum requirements have been met. If not, is there a responsive
>>> chapter leader or intention and action on the part of a chapter leader to
>>> meet requirements? I give a week to reply to my inquiries to judge whether
>>> the leader is responsive, and if they request it, a one month grace period
>>> to get evidence of activity on the chapter page, after which I will mark
>>> them active. (In practice it takes longer. There are a lot of open
>>> inquiries at the moment).
>>>
>>> The handbooks will need to have a definition of active to give meaning
>>> to this proposals.
>>>
>>> Noreen Whysel
>>> Community Manager
>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1YES 2YES 3YES 4(YES)
>>>> 5YES 6YES 7YES more?
>>>> 8YES 9YES 10YES almost there...
>>>> 11YES
>>>>
>>>> Let's get these funds moving and serving the mission.
>>>>
>>>> Aloha,
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/9/15 10:22 PM, Josh Sokol wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My vote: Yes
>>>>
>>>> Votes (please update when you reply all with your vote)
>>>> Andrew: Yes
>>>> Michael: Yes
>>>> Jim: *
>>>> Josh: Yes
>>>> Fabio:
>>>> Matt:
>>>> Tobias: Yes
>>>>
>>>> * Assuming they vote yes since they proposed and seconded
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes. (Tobias)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/10/15 18:16, Michael Coates wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My vote: Yes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Votes (please update when you reply all with your vote)
>>>>> Andrew: Yes
>>>>> Michael: Yes
>>>>> Jim: *
>>>>> Josh: *
>>>>> Fabio:
>>>>> Matt:
>>>>> Tobias:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Assuming they vote yes since they proposed and seconded
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Michael Coates | @_mwc
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>>>>> OWASP Global Board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Andrew van der Stock <
>>>>> vanderaj at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I e-vote yes to this amended proposal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seconded
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jim Manico
>>>>>>> Global Board Member
>>>>>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>>>>> https://www.owasp.org
>>>>>>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 2:57 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I made a change to clarify the definition of "active" as it relates
>>>>>>> to chapters and projects upon Tobias' request, but the idea is still the
>>>>>>> same.  I would like to motion that we approve proposal 3 of the funding
>>>>>>> initiative discussed at the last Board meeting.  The exact wording is as
>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *All accounts belonging to active chapters and projects, as defined
>>>>>>> in the Chapter and Project Handbooks respectively, with balances less than
>>>>>>> $500, will be brought to $500 beginning January 1, 2016 as long as there
>>>>>>> are at least two active leaders at that time.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do I hear a second?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-board mailing listOwasp-board at lists.owasp.orghttps://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Owasp-board mailing listOwasp-board at lists.owasp.orghttps://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jim Manico
>>>> Global Board Member
>>>> OWASP Foundationhttps://www.owasp.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151013/e5351cb2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list