[Owasp-board] Motion to approve proposal 11

Jim Manico jim.manico at owasp.org
Tue Oct 13 09:40:52 UTC 2015


I vote yes, that is at least 4 - the "bill" is passed.

--
Jim Manico
Global Board Member
OWASP Foundation
https://www.owasp.org
Join me in Rome for AppSecEU 2016!

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Fabio Cerullo <fcerullo at owasp.org> wrote:
> 
> I like the idea of rewarding project leaders who achieve lab/flagship status.
> 
> But without a clear clear/documented definition of active leader I would vote NO.
> 
> Fabio Cerullo
> Global Board Member
> OWASP Foundation
> https://www.owasp.org
> 
>> On 13 Oct 2015, at 3:37 a.m., Matt Konda <matt.konda at owasp.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I vote yes to #11.
>> 
>> That makes it 6 "Yes", Fabio outstanding.
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> I vote "Yes"
>>> 
>>> Votes:
>>> Tobias: Yes
>>> Josh: Yes
>>> Michael: Yes
>>> Andrew: 
>>> Jim: 
>>> Fabio: 
>>> Matt: 
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>> Yes. (Tobias)
>>>> (if there are no discussions)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 09/10/15 18:19, Michael Coates wrote:
>>>>> I have no discussions and vote yes at this time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Michael Coates | @_mwc
>>>>> OWASP Global Board
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Any discussion?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Seconded. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ooops, I copied and pasted from my previous messages.  Proposal 11 was NOT discussed at the last Board meeting.  This is a new proposal that Tobias put forward, I slightly revised the language, and am passing it along here.  Apologies for the miscommunication.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I would like to motion that we approve proposal 11 of the funding initiative discussed at the last Board meeting.  The exact wording is as follows:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Any project newly reaching lab status with an account balance less than $500 will be brought to $500 as long as there are at least two active leaders at that time.  Any project newly reaching flagship status with an account balance less than $1000 will be brought to $1000 as long as there are at least two active leaders at that time.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Do I hear a second?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151013/72b44487/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list