[Owasp-board] Motion to approve proposal 11

Tue Oct 13 09:26:37 UTC 2015

I like the idea of rewarding project leaders who achieve lab/flagship status.

But without a clear clear/documented definition of active leader I would vote NO.

Fabio Cerullo
Global Board Member
OWASP Foundation
https://www.owasp.org

> On 13 Oct 2015, at 3:37 a.m., Matt Konda <matt.konda at owasp.org> wrote:
> 
> I vote yes to #11.
> 
> That makes it 6 "Yes", Fabio outstanding.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
> I vote "Yes"
> 
> Votes:
> Tobias: Yes
> Josh: Yes
> Michael: Yes
> Andrew: 
> Jim: 
> Fabio: 
> Matt: 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org <mailto:tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>> wrote:
> Yes. (Tobias)
> (if there are no discussions)
> 
> 
> 
> On 09/10/15 18:19, Michael Coates wrote:
>> I have no discussions and vote yes at this time.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Michael Coates | @_mwc <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>> OWASP Global Board
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>> Any discussion?
>> 
>> ~josh
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj at owasp.org <mailto:vanderaj at owasp.org>> wrote:
>> Seconded. 
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>> Ooops, I copied and pasted from my previous messages.  Proposal 11 was NOT discussed at the last Board meeting.  This is a new proposal that Tobias put forward, I slightly revised the language, and am passing it along here.  Apologies for the miscommunication.
>> 
>> ~josh
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>> I would like to motion that we approve proposal 11 of the funding initiative discussed at the last Board meeting.  The exact wording is as follows:
>> 
>> Any project newly reaching lab status with an account balance less than $500 will be brought to $500 as long as there are at least two active leaders at that time.  Any project newly reaching flagship status with an account balance less than $1000 will be brought to $1000 as long as there are at least two active leaders at that time.
>> 
>> Do I hear a second?
>> 
>> ~josh
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board <https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151013/280c15a0/attachment.html>