[Owasp-board] Motion to approve proposal 5

Matt Konda matt.konda at owasp.org
Tue Oct 13 02:17:31 UTC 2015


I vote yes on #5.

That makes 6 of 7 yes with Fabio remaining.

Matt


On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:

> My vote: Yes
>
> Votes (please update when you reply all with your vote)
> Andrew: Yes
> Michael: Yes
> Jim: Yes
> Josh: Yes
> Fabio:
> Matt:
> Tobias: Yes
>
> * Assuming they vote yes since they proposed and seconded
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> My vote yes on all of these proposals.
>>
>>
>> On 10/9/15 6:17 PM, Michael Coates wrote:
>>
>> My vote: Yes
>>
>>
>> Votes (please update when you reply all with your vote)
>> Andrew: Yes
>> Michael: Yes
>> Jim: *
>> Josh: *
>> Fabio:
>> Matt:
>> Tobias:
>>
>> * Assuming they vote yes since they proposed and seconded
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Coates | @_mwc <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>> OWASP Global Board
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj at owasp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, this is not an amended proposal. I vote for the text as above.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Andrew van der Stock <
>>> <vanderaj at owasp.org>vanderaj at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I e-vote yes to this amended proposal.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Jim Manico < <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>>>> jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seconded
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jim Manico
>>>>> Global Board Member
>>>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>>> https://www.owasp.org
>>>>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:01 AM, Josh Sokol < <josh.sokol at owasp.org>
>>>>> josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to motion that we approve proposal 5 of the funding
>>>>> initiative discussed at the last Board meeting.  The exact wording is as
>>>>> follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> *All requests for funding, who proposed the request, relevant
>>>>> discussions, votes around funding, and request approval/denial are a matter
>>>>> of public record and must be put in a public location that is easily
>>>>> accessible to the OWASP community.*
>>>>>
>>>>> Do I hear a second?
>>>>>
>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim Manico
>> Global Board Member
>> OWASP Foundationhttps://www.owasp.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151012/e8436a5d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list