[Owasp-board] Motion to approve proposal 3

Matt Konda matt.konda at owasp.org
Tue Oct 13 01:58:05 UTC 2015


I vote yes for #3.

We have Jim, Michael, Andrew, Matt, Josh and Tobias in favor based on this
thread.

Awaiting input from Fabio.

Matt

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Noreen Whysel <noreen.whysel at owasp.org>
wrote:

> Proposed Definitions for chapter leader handbook:
>
> Active Chapter: An active chapter is one that meets the minimum
> requirements outlined in Chapter 2 of the Chapter Leader Handbook. Chapters
> that do not meet minimum requirements will be marked inactive and will not
> be eligible for Community Engagement funding.
>
> Active Chapter Leader: An active chapter leader is a person whose name is
> listed on the chapter wiki page and is included on the administrator list
> of the chapter Mailman list. Active chapter leaders must be responsive to
> the Community and the Foundation via email or other correspondence.
>
> Addition for discussion:
>
> If, after a reasonable amount of time, a chapter leader has not responded
> to inquiries via their contact email and the chapter Mailman list, the
> Foundation reserves the right to grant leadership status to a new
> volunteer.
>
> Noreen Whysel
> Community Manager
> OWASP Foundation
>
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Noreen,
>
> thank you very much for pointing that out.
> Could you prepare a description for what would be a definition you think
> makes sense, for next Wednesday?
>
> @Josh: I think we (our operations team and possibly us) need to be clear
> on that answer for this proposal to work properly.  Otherwise, we will make
> it ambiguous/unclear and hard  to implement for our team.
>
> Best, Tobias
>
>
> On 11/10/15 19:08, Josh Sokol wrote:
>
> I agree 100%.  Is that something that you can work on updating for us,
> Noreen?  It sounds like you have a well thought out process already.  It
> just needs to be documented in the proper place.  Thank you!
>
> ~josh
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Noreen Whysel <noreen.whysel at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Regarding this proposal, there will need to be a corresponding definition
>> of active in the handbooks. Right now there is only an implied definition
>> that an active chapter is one that fulfills minimum requirements. This is
>> not stated explicitly. There is a line in Chapter 2 that say is at least 4
>> chapter meetings per year is "recommended" to be considered active.
>>
>> In my audits, the decision to inactivate a chapter is discretionary, not
>> prescriptive: Preceding the decision to mark a chapter as inactive, I look
>> to see if minimum requirements have been met. If not, is there a responsive
>> chapter leader or intention and action on the part of a chapter leader to
>> meet requirements? I give a week to reply to my inquiries to judge whether
>> the leader is responsive, and if they request it, a one month grace period
>> to get evidence of activity on the chapter page, after which I will mark
>> them active. (In practice it takes longer. There are a lot of open
>> inquiries at the moment).
>>
>> The handbooks will need to have a definition of active to give meaning to
>> this proposals.
>>
>> Noreen Whysel
>> Community Manager
>> OWASP Foundation
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> 1YES 2YES 3YES 4(YES)
>>> 5YES 6YES 7YES more?
>>> 8YES 9YES 10YES almost there...
>>> 11YES
>>>
>>> Let's get these funds moving and serving the mission.
>>>
>>> Aloha,
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/9/15 10:22 PM, Josh Sokol wrote:
>>>
>>> My vote: Yes
>>>
>>> Votes (please update when you reply all with your vote)
>>> Andrew: Yes
>>> Michael: Yes
>>> Jim: *
>>> Josh: Yes
>>> Fabio:
>>> Matt:
>>> Tobias: Yes
>>>
>>> * Assuming they vote yes since they proposed and seconded
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes. (Tobias)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/10/15 18:16, Michael Coates wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My vote: Yes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Votes (please update when you reply all with your vote)
>>>> Andrew: Yes
>>>> Michael: Yes
>>>> Jim: *
>>>> Josh: *
>>>> Fabio:
>>>> Matt:
>>>> Tobias:
>>>>
>>>> * Assuming they vote yes since they proposed and seconded
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Coates | @_mwc
>>>> <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>>>> OWASP Global Board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Andrew van der Stock <
>>>> vanderaj at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I e-vote yes to this amended proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seconded
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jim Manico
>>>>>> Global Board Member
>>>>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>>>> https://www.owasp.org
>>>>>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 2:57 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I made a change to clarify the definition of "active" as it relates
>>>>>> to chapters and projects upon Tobias' request, but the idea is still the
>>>>>> same.  I would like to motion that we approve proposal 3 of the funding
>>>>>> initiative discussed at the last Board meeting.  The exact wording is as
>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *All accounts belonging to active chapters and projects, as defined
>>>>>> in the Chapter and Project Handbooks respectively, with balances less than
>>>>>> $500, will be brought to $500 beginning January 1, 2016 as long as there
>>>>>> are at least two active leaders at that time.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do I hear a second?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Owasp-board mailing listOwasp-board at lists.owasp.orghttps://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing listOwasp-board at lists.owasp.orghttps://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Manico
>>> Global Board Member
>>> OWASP Foundationhttps://www.owasp.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151012/a1ab53f3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list