[Owasp-board] Motion to approve proposal 2

Matt Konda matt.konda at owasp.org
Tue Oct 13 01:55:55 UTC 2015


For #2 I vote yes.

I assume that Michael does since he seconded it above.  We also have Jim,
Josh and Andrew's votes.

Missing Tobias and Fabio.  Input?

Matt


On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj at owasp.org>
wrote:

> I like this one. I will vote for it.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Josh. So I second all funding proposals on the table that need
>> seconding. Will wait for discussion to vote.
>> --
>> Jim Manico
>> Global Board Member
>> OWASP Foundation
>> https://www.owasp.org
>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>>
>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 4:24 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>> To follow the process...discussion first, then votes.
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I vote yes for all current funding proposals on the table.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Manico
>>> Global Board Member
>>> OWASP Foundation
>>> https://www.owasp.org
>>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>>>
>>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 12:25 AM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Second.
>>>
>>> (I'd be fine to vote for the entire series of proposals too, but happy
>>> to move along this one)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Coates | @_mwc
>>> <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>>> OWASP Global Board
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would like to motion that we approve proposal 2 of the funding
>>>> initiative discussed at the last Board meeting.  The exact wording is as
>>>> follows:
>>>>
>>>> *There should be no such thing as negative account balances for
>>>> chapters or projects going forward.  If the intent is to spend more money
>>>> than is currently in the account, the money should be taken and approved
>>>> from Foundation funding sources, subject to Foundation approval. *
>>>>
>>>> Do I hear a second?
>>>>
>>>> ~josh
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151012/b1422b24/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list