[Owasp-board] Motion to approve proposal 8

Josh Sokol josh.sokol at owasp.org
Sun Oct 11 17:07:56 UTC 2015


+1, Michael.  Let the operations team handle the process.

~josh

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>
wrote:

> Sounds like a procedural detail we can iron out later. We don't want a
> high level policy to lock us in to any specific technology approach or
> we'll have to update the policy just to switch from an email approach to a
> form.
>
>
>
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Fabio Cerullo <fcerullo at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks Josh. My concern is that not everyone could send mails to the
> owasp-board list and some requests could get lost in the mix.
>
> I would suggest changing the paragraph below to send all requests via the
> contact us form?
>
> https://www.tfaforms.com/308703
>
> There is a dropdown on that form and we could create a category ‘budget’.
>
> That way everything is captured and is easy to follow for Ops/Board.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabio Cerullo
> Global Board Member
> OWASP Foundation
> https://www.owasp.org
> Join me at AppSecUSA 2015 <https://2015.appsecusa.org> in San Francisco!
>
> On 11 Oct 2015, at 4:29 p.m., Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, the idea is that the Board is then able to use that data to make
> informed decisions with respect to the following years budget.  Sending to
> the Board list is sufficient.  Or the Chair.  Or the ED.  As long as the
> Board gets it.  Feel free to write up a process for it if you feel so
> inclined.
>
> ~josh
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Fabio Cerullo <fcerullo at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Guys
>>
>> Are we sure we want to ask leaders to send the budget to the Board as
>> currently stated?
>>
>> If so what would be the process? Would it be sufficient to send an email
>> to the board list?
>>
>> Just want to make sure there is a process behind it like funding requests:
>>
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Funding
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Fabio Cerullo
>> Global Board Member
>> OWASP Foundation
>> https://www.owasp.org
>> Join me at AppSecUSA 2015 <https://2015.appsecusa.org/> in San Francisco!
>>
>> On 10 Oct 2015, at 5:15 p.m., Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yea from me as well.
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj at owasp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> With Dec 1, I vote yes.
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I vote "Yes".
>>>
>>> ~josh
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think that is a good idea.
>>>> Best, Tobias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/10/15 17:42, Josh Sokol wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Andrew, I think that we vote on this with the forward-thinking
>>>> model, but revise the dates (or provide guidance to the Ops Team to do so)
>>>> for 2016 planning so that the Leaders have more time.  Maybe give them
>>>> until December 1 this year instead?
>>>>
>>>> ~josh
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Andrew van der Stock <
>>>> vanderaj at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I *will* vote for this as we need to get the chapters to establish
>>>>> great plans for the cash held in their names, but I do not like
>>>>> retrospective dates. Could we move the dates forward to take effect after
>>>>> we complete our vote? If so, I will vote yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seconded
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jim Manico
>>>>>> Global Board Member
>>>>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>>>> https://www.owasp.org
>>>>>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to motion that we approve proposal 8 of the funding
>>>>>> initiative discussed at the last Board meeting.  The exact wording is as
>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Chapters and projects with $5,000 or more in their account on
>>>>>> October 1 are required to create a budget and provide it to the OWASP Board
>>>>>> prior to November 1 for inclusion in the Foundation budget for the
>>>>>> following calendar year.  The budget should identify how they plan to spend
>>>>>> the money in their account over the course of the next year.  A future
>>>>>> projection budget can be included as well for forecasted spending within
>>>>>> the next 2 years.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do I hear a second?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~josh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Owasp-board mailing listOwasp-board at lists.owasp.orghttps://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151011/fd51930d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list