[Owasp-board] Board meeting on Oct - 14 - list of topics

psiinon psiinon at gmail.com
Fri Oct 9 09:39:07 UTC 2015


Thanks :)

If it was at a more reasonable time for me I'd join in, but unfortunately
its not.
Look forward to seeing what's decided...

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:

> I will add this to the agenda.
>
> - Jim
>
>
> On 10/9/15 11:28 AM, psiinon wrote:
>
> *sigh*
>
> So no discussion about the Benchmark project then?
>
> I think the board _should_ discuss it, and I've explicitly asked for it to
> be discussed.
>
> I dont think I'll be the only OWASP member who will be disappointed it its
> not....
>
> Simon
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear fellow board members,
>>
>> for our meeting on Oct-14 and in general I have the following topics for
>> your consideration:
>>
>> * structuring of meetings:
>> To have a better time management, I like to introduce that we in the
>> future list proposed durations to each point, one duration for you
>> presenting the proposal, second duration for discussion time if a vote is
>> needed - 1min
>>
>> * remove the section on chairman's and role reports and move to a topic
>> based agenda (3min)
>> IMO the different report sections for each board member are not useful to
>> keep us efficient. I would suggest to move to a topic based agenda. Not in
>> the order of roles.
>>
>> * Start of Budgeting for 2016 discussion & timeline (2min)
>> This is just to announce that we initiate our budgeting phase now for
>> 2016. Which needs to close by December.
>>
>> * start of review of Strategic Goals for 2015 and Discussion on Strategic
>> Goals for 2016 - timeline (2min)
>> This is just to announce that we initiate our budgeting phase now for
>> 2016. Which needs to close by December.
>>
>> * evotes procedure: how many days should we wait between second of motion
>> to give all board members time to raise discussion?
>> As we like to be able to conduct evotes, it would be good to have a
>> common understanding on the procedure.
>> making a motion and seconding it via emails is clear. However, for the
>> next step of giving opportunity for discussion before we move to vote, I
>> like to hear from the board how much time we shall give to raise discussion
>> elements before we progress to an evote. This is not to set a time limit on
>> an ongoing discussion, but to understand the timelimit we shall set for
>> silence by board members in case a topic is raised but not questions for
>> discussion are raised by board members before we can progress to an evote.
>>
>> * bylaws: term limits (will raise in seperate email, 5 min, initial
>> discussion, vote could come next month or via evote)
>>
>> Best regards, Tobias
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> OWASP ZAP <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ZAP> Project leader
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing listOwasp-board at lists.owasp.orghttps://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
> --
> Jim Manico
> Global Board Member
> OWASP Foundationhttps://www.owasp.org
>
>


-- 
OWASP ZAP <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ZAP> Project leader
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151009/c2785cd5/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list