[Owasp-board] Board meeting on Oct - 14 - list of topics

Jim Manico jim.manico at owasp.org
Fri Oct 9 09:35:52 UTC 2015


I will add this to the agenda.

- Jim

On 10/9/15 11:28 AM, psiinon wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> So no discussion about the Benchmark project then?
>
> I think the board _should_ discuss it, and I've explicitly asked for 
> it to be discussed.
>
> I dont think I'll be the only OWASP member who will be disappointed it 
> its not....
>
> Simon
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org 
> <mailto:tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>     Dear fellow board members,
>
>     for our meeting on Oct-14 and in general I have the following
>     topics for your consideration:
>
>     * structuring of meetings:
>     To have a better time management, I like to introduce that we in
>     the future list proposed durations to each point, one duration for
>     you presenting the proposal, second duration for discussion time
>     if a vote is needed - 1min
>
>     * remove the section on chairman's and role reports and move to a
>     topic based agenda (3min)
>     IMO the different report sections for each board member are not
>     useful to keep us efficient. I would suggest to move to a topic
>     based agenda. Not in the order of roles.
>
>     * Start of Budgeting for 2016 discussion & timeline (2min)
>     This is just to announce that we initiate our budgeting phase now
>     for 2016. Which needs to close by December.
>
>     * start of review of Strategic Goals for 2015 and Discussion on
>     Strategic Goals for 2016 - timeline (2min)
>     This is just to announce that we initiate our budgeting phase now
>     for 2016. Which needs to close by December.
>
>     * evotes procedure: how many days should we wait between second of
>     motion to give all board members time to raise discussion?
>     As we like to be able to conduct evotes, it would be good to have
>     a common understanding on the procedure.
>     making a motion and seconding it via emails is clear. However, for
>     the next step of giving opportunity for discussion before we move
>     to vote, I like to hear from the board how much time we shall give
>     to raise discussion elements before we progress to an evote. This
>     is not to set a time limit on an ongoing discussion, but to
>     understand the timelimit we shall set for silence by board members
>     in case a topic is raised but not questions for discussion are
>     raised by board members before we can progress to an evote.
>
>     * bylaws: term limits (will raise in seperate email, 5 min,
>     initial discussion, vote could come next month or via evote)
>
>     Best regards, Tobias
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Owasp-board mailing list
>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> OWASP ZAP <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ZAP> Project leader
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board

-- 
Jim Manico
Global Board Member
OWASP Foundation
https://www.owasp.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151009/89baf69e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list