[Owasp-board] Apache Brand Guidelines

[Jim Manico]

Matt,

Absolutely, I would MUCH rather have legal resources work on this than 
I. I'm ok to spend money on this, it's very important. 
IANALOASAIDWTBALOAS[*]

Tom is always pushing me to "actually do something, and not just talk 
about it" and he is right. But this is a (much) better course.

Let do it.

- Jim

I
Am
Not
A
Lawyer
Or
A
Sherif
And
I
Don't
Want
To
Be
A
Lawyer
Or
A
Sherif



On 11/30/15 11:35 PM, Matt Konda wrote:
> Jim,
>
> We talked about both Apache and Mozilla.  I like this route too.
>
> We had hoped to enlist one of their legal team's support as part of 
> their commitment to open source and to get more than just a starting 
> point but a collaborative product.  That may or may not be realistic, 
> but it seemed like a good way to get started.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org 
> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>     Someone recently suggested we model a new OWASP brand guideline
>     after the Apache foundation.
>
>     I discussed some of the details of this back in 2013
>
>     http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/2013-April/009123.html
>
>     I'd be glad to draft a new policy with Josh and others if you
>     would all like. I think it will do wonders to help keep
>     benchmark-like issues at bay as well as give us a little muscle to
>     clean up search term advertising using OWASP.
>
>     - Jim
>     _______________________________________________
>     Owasp-board mailing list
>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20151130/11563a16/attachment.html>