[Owasp-board] SWAMP Project Request

[Tobias]

I think the question is what is exactly in the project write-up for the 
project request.
If that is open source, we should be open and look at it.

Best regards, Tobias


On 13/03/15 10:29, Jim Manico wrote:
> Johanna,
>
> This is an easy one. To be an OWASP project you must be open source. 
> :) If not, no OWASP project!
>
> Aloha,
> Jim
>
>
> On 3/13/15 12:31 AM, johanna curiel curiel wrote:
>> Kate,
>>
>> The main condition is to be open source and to have an open source 
>> license.
>>
>> After having used the swamp, it is quite difficult to categorized it 
>> as a code or tool but especially being open source.
>>
>> I consider the swap a service and it's environment is not open , in 
>> fact, you run scanning on code and tool projects in a closed 
>> environment to the user on their servers.
>>
>> What I consider the swamp a great service to verify the quality of 
>> certain projects that can be run in their servers and I believe that 
>> projects that can run their code in these servers could make 
>> excellent use of it as a verification of minimum quality.
>>
>> I have ideas regarding how we could encourage projects to run their 
>> code especially if we link this to measuring quality criteria when 
>> doing reviews and gaining higher status and I would like to discuss 
>> this with you and the board if you are interested
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Johanna
>>
>> On Thursday, March 12, 2015, Tom Brennan <tomb at proactiverisk.com 
>> <mailto:tomb at proactiverisk.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     He has to follow the project guidelines like everyone else ;)
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Kate Hartmann
>>     <kate.hartmann at owasp.org
>>     <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kate.hartmann at owasp.org');>> wrote:
>>
>>         Board, I know that there had been multiple conversations with
>>         SWAMP, especially in Denver last year.
>>
>>         I received a "new project request" from Patrick Beyer asking
>>         that SWAMP be set up as an OWASP project.
>>
>>         I wanted to understand what the "next steps" are with this
>>         request.
>>
>>
>>         Thank you.
>>
>>         -- 
>>
>>
>>         Kate Hartmann
>>         kate.hartmann at owasp.org
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kate.hartmann at owasp.org');>
>>         +1 301-275-9403 <tel:%2B1%20301-275-9403>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Owasp-board mailing list
>>         Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>         <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org');>
>>         https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150316/8812db62/attachment.html>