[Owasp-board] AppSecUSA 2016 - Discussion
Jim Manico
jim.manico at owasp.org
Tue Jun 30 21:56:22 UTC 2015
Matt,
A significant amount of collaboration already happens between OWASP
members and developer conferences. I am very interested in ways to
expand that.
I would not suggest such a partnership for one of our main national
OWASP conferences however. Revenue sharing alone might be a big issue.
But having OWASP presences at major developer conferences? Or having
full OWASP tracks at different major developer conferences? I'm all for
that...
Aloha,
Jim
On 6/30/15 4:08 AM, Matt Konda wrote:
> This may not be something we want to really do, but I suppose one
> potential option would be to find a developer conference and approach
> them about collaborating. An option might be:
> http://www.thestrangeloop.com/ or http://www.springone2gx.com/.
>
> We could do something like see if we could set up reciprocity between
> the badges and some sort of $ sharing based on attendance... if the
> venue can handle our additional volume, it could make planning easier
> and give both organizers an economy of scale. It also aligns with
> strategic objectives of cross pollinating with devs.
>
> I wouldn't actually /recommend/ this route in its current (not even
> real proposal) state unless people rallied behind it and we found a
> really good option for partnering that worked based on size and
> location. But its something to think about ...
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Tom Brennan <tomb at proactiverisk.com
> <mailto:tomb at proactiverisk.com>> wrote:
>
> Alcon; NYC is always a great place and why I choose to live in the
> area. We did it in 2008 and 2013 and were profitable both times
> and I invested a lot of time as well as many
> volunteers. Those experiences ARE currently being applied to
> http://www.nymjcsc.org and the direction we should take in the
> future we OWASP already has agreements in place. (Be inclusive, be
> cheap to attend and drive awareness)
>
> The crew is also planning a regional event in 2016 & 2017 that
> mirrors the OWASP LASCON event we have a plan in motion. I would
> suggest a call with all involved people on July 6th 7th or morning
> of the 10th.
>
> Having been around the block with OWASP I believe that Vegas
> or Orlando, FL should be considered ideal for a global
> and annual OWASP AppSecUSA will discuss why on the call. I have
> also motioned for the OWASP USA summit event in New Jersey so
> lets discuss and have always supported OWASP Hawaii ;)
>
> It's not as easy as just changing the 2013 website
> http://2013.appsecusa.org but let's discuss
>
> Brennan
> 973-202-0122 <tel:973-202-0122>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org
> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
> +1 NYC and surrounding area. Proximity of staff and past
> successes make this a compelling choice if we go in this
> direction.
>
> --
> Jim Manico
> Global Board Member
> OWASP Foundation
> https://www.owasp.org <https://www.owasp.org/>
> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Noreen Whysel OWASP
> <noreen.whysel at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> I am in NYC, right in Upper West Side Manhattan. Kelly and
>> Claudia are NJ. I have done Amtrak to Baltimore and DC.
>> Flights are cheap, frequent and short. Philly is another
>> fairly central option of you are looking at proximity to east
>> coast staff.
>>
>> Noreen Whysel
>> Community Manager
>> OWASP Foundation
>>
>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Alison Shrader
>> <alison.mcnamee at owasp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Just one note on the Baltimore area….I am the only one that
>>> is very close.
>>>
>>> Kate would not need to pay for a flight, but is not close
>>> enough to not need a hotel. Everybody else would still need
>>> a flight as well.
>>>
>>> Alison Shrader
>>>
>>> OWASP Accounting
>>>
>>> 1200C Agora Dr, #232
>>>
>>> Bel Air, MD 21014
>>>
>>> USA
>>>
>>> 1-410-440-5430 <tel:1-410-440-5430>
>>>
>>> *From:*owasp-board-bounces at lists.owasp.org
>>> [mailto:owasp-board-bounces at lists.owasp.org] *On Behalf Of
>>> *Michael Coates
>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 29, 2015 7:40 PM
>>> *To:* Andrew van der Stock
>>> *Cc:* OWASP Foundation Board List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Owasp-board] AppSecUSA 2016 - Discussion
>>>
>>> Andrew,
>>>
>>> Since we're in some ways putting the cart before the horse,
>>> from your comments can I conclude you are for a foundation
>>> driven planning for AppSecUSA 2016?
>>>
>>> To your notes, I do like the following ideas you mentioned.
>>>
>>> 1. Picking a location where we've already been will
>>> drastically reduce effort and work because we've already
>>> used the location.
>>>
>>> 2. Moving to a foundation driven planning event would open
>>> up more funds since the split would be eliminated.
>>>
>>> 3. Proximity of staff is helpful. We have 2 in the bay area
>>> and several in the baltimore area
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Coates | @_mwc
>>> <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>>>
>>> OWASP Global Board
>>>
>>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://AppSecUSA.org> 2015 in San
>>> Francisco!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Andrew van der Stock
>>> <vanderaj at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> Agreed we need to get on it.
>>>
>>> My views are to first pick a city, and then that should help
>>> crystallize volunteer support once they know for sure that
>>> they are getting a major conference.
>>>
>>> * *NYC* - we had a great event in 2013, and we know the
>>> hotel can help us even if we don't have bodies on the
>>> ground. We can use the additional revenue from a lack of
>>> splitting with a chapter to use more hotel resources in
>>> the planning phase.
>>> * *Baltimore* - this is close to OWASP HQ, and thus
>>> Foundation staff can do be there without hotel and
>>> travel costs. BWI is a great airport and has public
>>> transport linkages to Baltimore.This is a good option if
>>> we don't find any on the ground volunteers, as I'm sure
>>> Baltimore has similar convention capabilities to NYC,
>>> plus local OWASP staff.
>>> * I would suggest we consider *DC* as a distant third
>>> option for discussion as that DC is a hub for government
>>> agencies, but honestly, this is almost as bad as NYC in
>>> terms of getting OWASP Foundation staff to travel to DC
>>> as it's a good 1.5-2 hours from OWASP HQ to DC.
>>>
>>> I think we need to pick a location, and then find volunteers
>>> to help once they know that it will be in their neck of the
>>> woods.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Noreen Whysel OWASP
>>> <noreen.whysel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The most successful events I've attended already had a
>>> location and team in place for the next year to announce at
>>> the current year's event.
>>>
>>>
>>> Noreen Whysel
>>>
>>> Community Manager
>>>
>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 3:09 PM, Michael Coates
>>> <michael.coates at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Board,
>>>
>>> I'd like to suggest the following for discussion and
>>> information gathering.
>>>
>>> /Motion to move full responsibility of planning and
>>> execution of the AppSecUSA 2016 conference to the OWASP
>>> Foundation./
>>>
>>> *Current Situation*
>>>
>>> - Open call for hosts conducted and conference is
>>> awarded to the most qualified submission
>>>
>>> - No submissions for AppSecUSA were submitted during
>>> first or second call (took place December and January
>>> 2014/2015)
>>>
>>> - A third call was recently announced by Laura just a
>>> few weeks ago.
>>>
>>> *Reality*
>>>
>>> - Conference planning needs 18 months. Planning within
>>> 12 months is possible, but much more difficult
>>>
>>> - If we don't make a decision to invest this to the full
>>> time resources of the foundation, we won't have
>>> AppSecUSA 2016
>>>
>>> - This would lead to a significant impact on foundation
>>> resources
>>>
>>> Opening for discussion. Thanks for your thoughts.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Coates | @_mwc
>>> <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>>>
>>> OWASP Global Board
>>>
>>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://AppSecUSA.org> 2015 in San
>>> Francisco!
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
>
> --
> Semper Fidelis,
>
> */Tom Brennan/*
> ProactiveRISK
> +1 888 255 0834 x799 <tel:%2B1%20888%20255%200834%20x799>
> www.proactiverisk.com <http://www.proactiverisk.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
--
Jim Manico
Global Board Member
OWASP Foundation
https://www.owasp.org
Join me at AppSecUSA 2015!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150630/b63d606c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Owasp-board
mailing list