[Owasp-board] Higher Criteria on Starting projects

johanna curiel curiel johanna.curiel at owasp.org
Mon Jun 22 23:30:49 UTC 2015


But....we need to be careful that ideas don't get misrepresented as
professional tools

Exactly, could be better said :-)
I think we are going to implement this for any new projects, through a new
category

And projects with no output at the moment will go into this category

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:

> I realize that I'm not really adding anything new to this discussion, but
> I think that the real challenge here is in creating project levels that
> more accurately reflect the maturity of the projects in our catalog.  There
> is nothing wrong with having a "ground floor" that serves as a starting
> point for ideas or even a lower level of an "idea board" that people could
> pick up and run with.  This is where creativity flows and innovation
> begins.  But....we need to be careful that ideas don't get misrepresented
> as professional tools.  To that extent, I trust Johanna and team to devise
> a system that allows everyone to flourish at OWASP, but still guides both
> projects and their users as to the maturity of the tools and documentation
> that are being represented.
>
> ~josh
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Cool stuff. I'm unsure the correlation between activity level and quality
>> is correct.
>>
>> Having weaker and stronger projects is per bell curve we will always have
>> that. Hopefully more weaker will become stronger over time.
>>
>> The day we don't have active incubator projects is a day to worry about
>> the health of OWASP as a whole.
>> IMHO project status is a strong indicator of how OWASP is doing.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Eoin Keary
>> BCC Risk Advisory - edgescan CTO
>> Gartner "notable vendor" MSSP MQ
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 Jun 2015, at 23:13, johanna curiel curiel <johanna.curiel at owasp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi MAtt
>>
>> Not sure if you are aware, we are using Openhub to track projects. It
>> gives us a quite complete report of the activity level of all the OWASP
>> projects using an open repository so we can track then.
>> https://www.openhub.net/orgs/OWASP
>>
>> <Screenshot 2015-06-21 16.11.19.png>
>>
>> I try to register them here and keep track. The main issue is empty
>> projects but we have reduce significantly the amount of empty projects,
>> however, there are some beginning with some lines of code and this is what
>> still concern us, because a few pages of text or some lines  of code cannot
>> be really consider a 'project'. This is where Timo and other members have
>> expressed their concern.
>>
>> I would like to discuss further your ideas on how to improve the project
>> platform faster and get more quality project  to certain status
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Johanna
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OWASP Projects Task Force" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to projects-task-force+unsubscribe at owasp.org.
>> To post to this group, send email to projects-task-force at owasp.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/owasp.org/d/msgid/projects-task-force/CACxry_1rTgx3EQ%2BQqqS%3DGtxsuPrKzLRPsvB_hxgCjfMQJzyv0A%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/owasp.org/d/msgid/projects-task-force/CACxry_1rTgx3EQ%2BQqqS%3DGtxsuPrKzLRPsvB_hxgCjfMQJzyv0A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150622/1539dfe3/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list