[Owasp-board] Higher Criteria on Starting projects
timo.goosen at owasp.org
Sun Jun 21 19:26:37 UTC 2015
Thanks Johanna for raising this issue.
There are even many empty projects on the project inventory. (Projects with
I'd like to see a stricter criteria on starting a project. There is no
shortage of good quality security related open source projects out there
so by no means do I feel a need to lower the bar for starting an OWASP
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:25 PM, johanna curiel curiel <
johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
> Dear Board and members of the Project Task Force
> A while ago, Timo Goosen and some owasp members have expressed their
> concern regarding of Projects (Incubators) and their low level of quality.
> It has come to our attention that there are projects started and in the
> opinion of some community members have very little added value top the
> OWASP project inventory. Therefore we want to revise the actual criteria
> but also we want to be as fair as we can providing opportunity to anyone to
> start a project, however we want value and projects that have a certain
> level of quality.
> I think we need to revise this criteria and create incentives for
> researchers interested to join OWASP with their projects.
> Right now we are giving a free pass to anyone, but we have seen way too
> many low quality projects that add no new value at all, in our opinion.
> Tools that sometimes do absolutely nothing to improve security or even
> reach a level of at least being properly installed or used.
> We would like to get some feedback on this, because we are really concern
> that sometimes people use OWASP to start a project without substance or any
> added value.
> @Timo, feel free to comment on your concerns
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board