[Owasp-board] Regarding Hackademic project

Konstantinos Papapanagiotou Konstantinos at owasp.org
Thu Jul 23 12:05:06 UTC 2015


Most of our commits are on the 'next' branch:

I believe that funds were allocated through the agreed, transparent
procedure for the code sprint. If other projects are in need of funds why
didn't they apply?

Also as I've said in the past, there are projects that are almost identical
copies of hackademic that have also received funds even though at that time
they didn't have one line of code. Why weren't you skeptical about those
projects but on the contrary quite supportive?

And last but not least, next time you want to make such allegations please
get in touch with me rather than send emails to the board behind my back.


On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:43 PM, johanna curiel curiel <
johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:

> Dear Task Force members and Board
> Over the last year, we have had a close look to the Hackademic project.
> Last year we did a testing during the month of October , executed by
> Marios Kourtesis and I. This year, Timo Goosen also did an evaluation on
> this project during the Project Summit EU.
> From the evaluations we could conclude the following:
>    - The project lacks documentation in order for first time users to
>    install and to build this properly
>    - The project does not have any developments except during the Google
>    summer of Code last year. You can see their contributions on their main
>    development branch here. Basically almost none(see attached image)
>       - https://www.openhub.net/p/hackademic
>    - I requested an update regarding their developments but never
>    received an answer on this
>    - Timo Goosen spent quite lot of time during the Summit working on
>    their project, developing documentation for them which they never updated
>    their wiki and use it
> Now this project is getting the sponsorship for the Summer of code when
> they hardly work on their development and to us it lacks a certain level of
> maturity and robustness which unfortunately there are other projects in
> incubator stage that are much better and more mature than this one.
> I strongly advise the board that before taking major decisions to spend
> money in activities for projects lacking a clear strcutural development ,
> to take the time and evaluate if the project deserves it.
> I think there are many other projects that can use that money and have
> shown committed and responsive project leaders
> Regards
> Johanna
> HACKADEMICS activity over the past 2 years:
> [image: Inline image 1]
> Johanna
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150723/c46d00f9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot 2015-07-23 07.38.03.png
Type: image/png
Size: 82965 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150723/c46d00f9/attachment-0001.png>

More information about the Owasp-board mailing list