[Owasp-board] AppSecUSA 2016 - Discussion

Tobias tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
Wed Jul 8 21:22:36 UTC 2015


Yes. I meant the selection of the _content_ should be done by community 
members. (e.g. select talks and training topics).
Best, Tobias


On 08/07/15 23:01, Michael Coates wrote:
> Ah. That makes more sense and seems like a reasonable item to charge 
> towards.
>
> Keen eye Jim - thanks for point that out.
>
>
> --
> Michael Coates | @_mwc <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
> OWASP Global Board
> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://AppSecUSA.org> 2015 in San Francisco!
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org 
> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>     Michael, he said "content selection", not "conference location".
>
>     --
>     Jim Manico
>     Global Board Member
>     OWASP Foundation
>     https://www.owasp.org <https://www.owasp.org/>
>     Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
>
>     On Jul 8, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Michael Coates
>     <michael.coates at owasp.org <mailto:michael.coates at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>>     By conference selection do you mean the community should pick the
>>     location of the conference?
>>
>>     If so, I disagree. The purpose pf soliciting chapters for hosting
>>     the conference was to get a group to signup to do a fair amount
>>     of work and host in their city. Since no one volunteered I'm
>>     suggesting we move the work of fully planning the conference to
>>     the foundation.
>>
>>     If the foundation, not a local chapter, is doing all the work
>>     then the foundation should pick the location that would lead to
>>     the best event given their restraints.
>>
>>     All chapters in the community are free to hold regional or
>>     chapter events of their choosing.
>>
>>     Either way, we should add to the agenda.
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Jul 8, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
>>     <mailto:tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>>     Michael,
>>>
>>>     I support the proposal. With one modification: content selection
>>>     should be done by members of the community.
>>>
>>>     Could we add this topic to the agenda of our next board meeting
>>>     for vote?
>>>     Do you like to add this to the agenda?
>>>
>>>     Best, Tobias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 29/06/15 21:09, Michael Coates wrote:
>>>>     Board,
>>>>
>>>>     I'd like to suggest the following for discussion and
>>>>     information gathering.
>>>>
>>>>     /Motion to move full responsibility of planning and execution
>>>>     of the AppSecUSA 2016 conference to the OWASP Foundation./
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     *Current Situation*
>>>>     - Open call for hosts conducted and conference is awarded to
>>>>     the most qualified submission
>>>>     - No submissions for AppSecUSA were submitted during first or
>>>>     second call (took place December and January 2014/2015)
>>>>     - A third call was recently announced by Laura just a few weeks
>>>>     ago.
>>>>
>>>>     *Reality*
>>>>     - Conference planning needs 18 months. Planning within 12
>>>>     months is possible, but much more difficult
>>>>     - If we don't make a decision to invest this to the full time
>>>>     resources of the foundation, we won't have AppSecUSA 2016
>>>>     - This would lead to a significant impact on foundation resources
>>>>
>>>>     Opening for discussion. Thanks for your thoughts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     --
>>>>     Michael Coates | @_mwc
>>>>     <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>>>>     OWASP Global Board
>>>>     Join me at AppSecUSA <http://AppSecUSA.org> 2015 in San Francisco!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     Owasp-board mailing list
>>>>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org  <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Owasp-board mailing list
>>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150708/90444c52/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list