[Owasp-board] [Owasp-leaders] Please submit your agenda and cost for the APPSEC US participation-Deadline 15th August

johanna curiel curiel johanna.curiel at owasp.org
Thu Jul 2 14:38:02 UTC 2015


I also think active leaders should always get a chance and they can because
the funding rules allows them
They can always submit for approval only limit is 1000. Per summit 1000 and
per year 2000
Based on this rule I do not see why active project leaders cannot apply to
assisting the summit

On Thursday, July 2, 2015, Timo Goosen <timo.goosen at owasp.org> wrote:

> >Dinis has been promoting the idea to come with  a huge summit like
> happened in Lisbon 2008, but the question is: Do we want to spend so much
> money >on a huge summit? who is allow to come? How do we decide this?
> In my opinion those who are most active should be allowed to come in terms
> of adding code on their repo's on github or just are in general doing lots
> for the community either on mailing lists or on the wiki.
>
> I can name some examples of people who I think are very obviously very
> active: Simon (From ZAP), Enrico (From Python security), Johanna (Project
> task force), Colin and John (from AppSensor).  The list goes on...
> This is not a very measurable metric , but maybe people can apply to go to
> the project summit and those in charge of accepting them can look into just
> how active they have been and if necessary.
>
>
> Regards.
> Timo
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:47 PM, johanna curiel curiel <
> johanna.curiel at owasp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johanna.curiel at owasp.org');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul
>>
>> That discussion about the 100k ended in setting up a committee, which I'm
>> leading with Tom and Eoin including Claudia as our support staff
>>
>> I did not have the impression that this discussion had something to do
>> directly with the actual summit in SFO.
>>
>> The committee still needs to setup some plan and propose this to the
>> board. (Next Summit initiatives)
>>
>> Dinis has been promoting the idea to come with  a huge summit like
>> happened in Lisbon 2008, but the question is: Do we want to spend so much
>> money on a huge summit? who is allow to come? How do we decide this?
>>
>> Like I said, we need to regulate this otherwise we will have a huge
>> amount of 'project leaders' that work hardly on their projects and see the
>> summit as a nice paid vacation
>>
>> That's why the committee is for ;-)
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Johanna
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Paul Ritchie <paul.ritchie at owasp.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','paul.ritchie at owasp.org');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Johanna with cc. to Claudia:
>>>
>>> I read with interest the recent discussion about a BIG project summit,
>>> to be funded with $100K, so my only comment is this.
>>>
>>> It might be helpful with announcements like this for the "APPSEC USA"
>>> Project summit to be really clear (in the body of the text) on which event
>>> you are asking for input so people don't get confused.
>>>
>>> I'm pretty excited for both events, and I just want to ensure there is
>>> good participation at the San Francisco AppSec for your Project summit, as
>>> well as the BIG Project summit once a planning team starts meeting and
>>> setting firm plans & dates around the BIG event.
>>>
>>> Just an observation.....Paul
>>>
>>> Best Regards, Paul Ritchie
>>> OWASP Executive Director
>>> paul.ritchie at owasp.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','paul.ritchie at owasp.org');>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:39 PM, johanna curiel curiel <
>>> johanna.curiel at owasp.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johanna.curiel at owasp.org');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Project leaders,
>>>>
>>>> You have reacted to the the call for participation, and you will have
>>>> until the 15th august to add your traveling ticket cost and Agenda. Failure
>>>> to do so, means that other leader in the waiting list will be accepted.
>>>>
>>>> Leaders that have reacted so far can be seen here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Beq2G5X-MZbE9nPRc23rfzzzApsYNThP3H6ADXRPQio/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> This time will be providing USD 250 fixed cost for hotel expenses, and
>>>> traveling depends on your ticket price. Please let me know this asap.
>>>>
>>>> For project leaders that did not participate during appsec EU and have
>>>> flagship status we have made an exception(Such as Azzedine from the CRSF
>>>> guard project) however the maximum allowance is USD1,000,- for the Ticket
>>>> in his case.
>>>>
>>>> CRSF has no funds so he can make use of the Summit budget. We will be
>>>> contributing to any project with LAB or Flasghip status, an amount of
>>>> USD250 for hotel as a way to help the project. We are very aware that there
>>>> are very few projects with big budgets ;-)
>>>>
>>>> @Michael Hidalgo: I noticed that you are not project leader but
>>>> chapter. You can participate if you are an active volunteer of a project,
>>>> but I need the approval from the project leader in order for you to speak
>>>> in his behalf during the summit
>>>>
>>>> Project leaders in far regions will be set in a waiting list. If there
>>>> is budget left after the 15th august, and they have an agenda with their
>>>> cost submitted, we will allocate their cost to the summit.
>>>>
>>>> Questions , please contact me
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Johanna Curiel
>>>> Project Review Team Leader
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OWASP-Leaders mailing list
>>>> OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OWASP-Leaders at lists.owasp.org');>
>>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org');>
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20150702/af059318/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list