[Owasp-board] Process Idea
fcerullo at owasp.org
Fri Feb 27 13:05:32 UTC 2015
I like it Matt. I think it would be great to have this streamlined in
So we could login into SF, add items, review them and vote on various
Then the minutes / votes could be extracted and published on the wiki.
@Kate: would it be possible to do this?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Matt Konda <matt.konda at owasp.org> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I noted to Josh and Tobias around the 1 on 1 call this week that when I
> look at the minutes from the last few OWASP Board meetings, there are very
> few "actions" in the sense of things that we vote on and make decisions
> I feel one reason for this may be that a number of the topics we are
> discussing are still raw and open when they come up for discussion. I also
> think that it is unclear which things are ready for voting and which aren't.
> I was wondering if we could adopt a slightly more formalized pipeline of
> "key business" and ask "sponsors" (us, leaders, staff) to prepare something
> a bit of background on them to try to encourage us to handle that key
> business up front. This is mock up example:
> I'm all for having discussion (and I think a number of the current threads
> are really useful) and I would also say that joining the weekly calls has
> been really helpful but I just want to encourage us to all do a little more
> work in the background before the meetings so that we can tie up really
> important things for the foundation.
> For example, I think in the next meeting we should aim to have voted on:
> 1. Project summit budget
> 2. Strategic goals
> 3. Virtual / Insperity
> 4. Inclusion
> 5. How we handle AppSecUSA in the absence of a chapter taking the lead
> 6. Any hiring / job business
> 7. Dev focused website (my new business)
> 8. ...
> To the extent that we can get the community to engage and be more active
> so that there are more issues to discuss and vote on, I think that is a
> good thing. Of course, hopefully most things the foundation does shouldn't
> ever be subject to a board vote - but for those that are, we may be able to
> make ourselves crisper with a little process.
> What do you all think?
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board