[Owasp-board] Project Summit countdown
Andrew van der Stock
vanderaj at owasp.org
Sun Feb 8 09:44:42 UTC 2015
As one of the leads for the ASVS and for lead for the DevGuide, I'm happy
to lead a half day on each at OWASP AppSec EU.
Definitely like the idea of a hack-a-thon, as long as it's a build a new
feature hack-a-thon. The BugCrowd style hack-a-thons were successful in the
past as well, but we need to line up our ducks in a row with our hoster,
SalesForce, and system admin staff to cope with that many folks having a go
out our infrastructure.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:26 AM, johanna curiel curiel <
johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
> I think this is definitely a good idea
> We can promote to the closest Universities in Amsterdam,however the
> technical ones are located at Delft and Eindhoven, the last one being one
> of the best in innovation and that one is quite far.
> What about start a contest at defcon?
> They are open to Proposals ;-) Hackaton OWASP projects?
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>
>> An idea -
>> Push the hackathon concept and see if we can bring in lots of new blood
>> college students. They could pick from 1 of X projects that want new
>> features or maybe prototype something new? You could add judging and a
>> prize and advertise heavily to nearby universities.
>> Just an idea.
>> Michael Coates | @_mwc <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=_mwc>
>> OWASP Global Board
>> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://AppSecUSA.org> 2015 in San Francisco!
>> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:47 AM, johanna curiel curiel <
>> johanna.curiel at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> Board and Project Leaders
>>> After a first call to get people to assist and participate into the
>>> Project Summit NL, only 2 major projects(Flagship) have reacted and would
>>> like to participate.
>>> - OWASP ZAP
>>> - OWTF
>>> Right now we have 2 rooms available for this day-20th May (Martin please
>>> confirm if this is still the case)
>>> For the rest I think we definitely need to breed in new life into
>>> projects participation. It can be that for projects with leaders located in
>>> USA, it will be more convenient to have a small summit there specially for
>>> them or, we can try to promote participation to projects (looking for
>>> volunteers, starting a project etc).
>>> So far , I don't think we can call this a Project Summit , and it might
>>> get down to ZAP/OWTF summit
>>> In that case is essential to know:
>>> - Identify how many people will be assisting to the ZAP and OWTF
>>> - IF Traveling tickets and accommodation could be paid for ZAP/OWTF
>>> - Coffee break sponsorship for the attendees of this summit
>>> That will basically resume the costs. based on this low attendance I
>>> don't think I'll be present in Amsterdam.
>>> I think we need to think of another strategy to promote Owasp projects
>>> through summits if we want to continue with this. What do we want to
>>> achieve indeed?
>>> My impression is that no new innovative projects are being started at
>>> We definitely need new 'blood' and innovative thinkers
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board