[Owasp-board] IBM and OWASP Top Ten
tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
Sun Aug 30 19:55:10 UTC 2015
Thank you for solving this.
Yes, the path of peace was the best in this case.
And in fact we are happy to see people like and use our stuff. ;-)
On 26/08/15 04:21, Jim Manico wrote:
> I appreciate comments to basically remain chill when approaching these
> folks. It was all a pleasant well received conversation.
> What I did was state, "this is what I see, is it a fair concern?"
> which I think is a good approach.
> I'll be the first to admit I am rather aggressive at times, but I
> think a gentle approach over these matters is the best path.
> Thanks Michael.
> Jim Manico
> Global Board Member
> OWASP Foundation
> https://www.owasp.org <https://www.owasp.org/>
> Join me at AppSecUSA <http://appsecusa.org/> 2015!
> On Aug 25, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org
> <mailto:michael.coates at owasp.org>> wrote:
>> Awesome. Glad we good work things out nicely. Go Owasp!
>>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org
>>> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>> A rep from IBM contacted me and acknowledge the concern with the
>>> eWeek article. They made a few more changes, thanked the OWASP
>>> Foundation for our work and will update the article shortly.
>>> All good, they were very accommodating and acknowledged the issue.
>>> Jim Manico
>>> Global Board Member
>>> OWASP Foundation
>>> Join me at AppSecUSA 2015!
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board