[Owasp-board] For Discussion - Hourly contractor for wiki housekeeping
jim.manico at owasp.org
Sun Aug 9 21:26:07 UTC 2015
>There would need to be a category that replaces "FIXME" with
"Archived" or something similar for the archived page.
That is currently the "historical" flag.
|[[Categorie:FIXME/historical]]| out of date but archived for
Some content is good to save, some is just junk. The wiki-editors group
is set up to answer those questions.
> Another issue I just thought of: If a page is simply archived it will
> still show up in search. This is not a problem if the page redirects
> to a newer or more relevant one. But could be if it is not clearly
> tagged as an archived/outdated page.
> Noreen Whysel
> Community Manager
> OWASP Foundation
> On Aug 9, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Bev Corwin <bev.corwin at owasp.org
> <mailto:bev.corwin at owasp.org>> wrote:
>> Nice explanation Noreen, thank you, just curious, do you think that
>> it is important to reference the history details on the pages, or
>> would the automated history / changes tracking information be enough
>> for anyone looking for any archives?
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noreen Whysel
>> <noreen.whysel at owasp.org <mailto:noreen.whysel at owasp.org>> wrote:
>> Redirects are simple. Add #REDIRECT [[:NewPage]] to the edit
>> field and it will redirect to the new page. All the old page
>> history is saved and viewed very easily by typing the URL,
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
Global Board Member
Join me at AppSecUSA 2015!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board