[Owasp-board] On vendor neutrality and projects....
eoin.keary at owasp.org
Sun Sep 28 17:04:22 UTC 2014
That's all good.
It's the assertion that the company has had some aspect of delivery of the project is what I am against.
Never mind. If it comes up we can take it case-in-point.
Owasp Global Board
+353 87 977 2988
On 28 Sep 2014, at 17:58, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org> wrote:
> Why would we be against anyone promoting a free and open project? Eg company x says Owasp project y is a good thing and devs should use it. Perhaps I'm not fully understanding what you mean.
> On Sep 28, 2014, at 8:53 AM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>> I'm against promoting owasp projects using respective orgs we work for unless they sponsored the project.
>> Our global owasp training events have no BCC or manicode branding and we give out our owasp credentials.
>> Adding links or associations to projects without real associations (sponsorship) is a bad thing.
>> I certainly don't think any board member should leverage such associations unless official and mandated.
>> Eoin Keary
>> Owasp Global Board
>> +353 87 977 2988
>> On 28 Sep 2014, at 16:42, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> Eoin, thats the same answer I gave, excellent and thanks.
>>> Jim Manico
>>> (808) 652-3805
>>> On Sep 28, 2014, at 6:15 AM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
>>>>> > If someone at an OWASP event asks for my card, is it permitted to have my company info on the card?
>>>> - depends on the reasons they are asking? Owasp related or commercial?
>>>> Eoin Keary
>>>> Owasp Global Board
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board