[Owasp-board] [Owasp_project_leader_list] Do you consider your project a Flagship status candidate?

Jim Manico jim.manico at owasp.org
Wed Jun 4 18:09:41 UTC 2014

> In my opinion, the actual (flagship before demotion) owasp documents
should keep his flagship status.

I think this is reasonable as well, or at least promote them at their next
upgrade cycle. These are some of our most mature projects...

But Johanna, I see your logic regarding a community vote for documentation
projects. These are not easy (docs) to evaluate.

So, thoughts board?

Jim Manico
(808) 652-3805

On Jun 4, 2014, at 8:05 AM, johanna curiel curiel <johanna.curiel at owasp.org>

In my proposal I mentioned something regarding documentation:

It is difficult to quantify how well written and accurate or not a document
is, unless the reviewer has a broad body of knowledge on the subject.
Finding the right reviewer is more challenging. This one will have to spend
 time reading and creating a report. An alternative might be to hire a
freelance technical editor/writer that can provide his input from the
documentation and editing point of view and how well written and consistent
the document is. This is more subjective and that's why I think that we
better leave documentation to the Rating system. Hiring a technical writer
and editor to provide his opinion could be an option, however, it is

In my opinion, the actual (flagship before demotion) owasp documents should
keep his flagship status. Most projects are in the process of updating
their information to a new version or they have already done that.

Documentation that has not been updated for more than 3 years and is not in
the process of updating their documentation should be verified with project
leaders' future plans regarding their project.

This is definitely out of the QA scope because this process review focuses
on Quality assurance of code and not documentation. Unfortunately, that is
more difficult to quantify than measuring quality of software and more time

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:

> Board,
> Someone from the testing guide and OWASP Top Ten wanted to know how
> •documentation projects• could reapply for flagship status. The current
> project eval reboot is for tools and libraries, documentation projects are
> out of scope right now.
> Any thoughts here?
> Aloha,
> --
> Jim Manico
> @Manicode
> (808) 652-3805
> Begin forwarded message:
> *From:* johanna curiel curiel <johanna.curiel at owasp.org>
> *Date:* June 4, 2014 at 6:25:48 AM HST
> *To:* "owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org" <owasp-leaders at lists.owasp.org>, "
> owasp_project_leader_list at lists.owasp.org" <
> owasp_project_leader_list at lists.owasp.org>, "
> owasp-projects-task-force at googlegroups.com" <
> owasp-projects-task-force at googlegroups.com>, Enrico Branca <
> enrico.branca at owasp.org>
> *Subject:* *[Owasp_project_leader_list] Do you consider your project a
> Flagship status candidate?*
> Hi Leaders
> In the process of reviewing projects at Quality assurance level for Tools
> and Code projects, I want to make sure we do not exclude those projects
> that right now are officially LABS and consider themselves ready for a
> review process to become Flagship.
> Keep reading if you want your project to be a flagship candidate.
> The process will have these important components:
>    - Code Analysis (SWAMP) (if written in Java, C++ or C): I would need
>    your permission to load the project into SWAMP
>    - Functional testing:Deploy the tool/Code in Virtual servers with a
>    full configured test environment. Project leaders will have access to these
>    - Access to JIRA to review test cases
>    - Analysis and use of Unit tests - Code coverage
> Make sure you understand what are the minimum qualifications to become
> flagship
> See attached document Project Health Criteria. We are using Ohloh as a
> measuring mechanism on activity and hopefully Enrico's tool will help us
> with that part too.
> Please contact the OWASP Project task force to add you to this list
> A preliminary analysis will be done to verify the actual Project Health
> Criteria and continue with the process of evaluation for flagship
> Regards
> Johanna
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20140604/461fa57c/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Owasp-board mailing list