[Owasp-board] March Calendar for Board Call

Fabio Cerullo fcerullo at owasp.org
Tue Jan 28 20:45:56 UTC 2014


Josh

C or D looks good to me.

Fabio

On Tuesday, January 28, 2014, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:

> Lets have a breakfast meeting on the [email protected]'8:00 am for 2 hrs???
>
>
> Eoin Keary
> Owasp Global Board
> +353 87 977 2988
>
>
> On 28 Jan 2014, at 17:54, Tom Brennan - OWASP <tomb at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> I can adjust fire likely for all of those times if a date is picked ASAP
> with family/work/personal obligations and other OWASP centric commitments
> projects/chapter.
>
> There will be a lot of us in town for RSA Circus so the 24th morning
> (before the OWASP training) could be a working "huddle" too. With a virtual
> conference for those that need to dial in.  I believe we are also sending
> our staff so if they can't be virtual how can we expect a board to be..
>  Regardless a face-to-face will happen with several of us (3) board and the
> ED in California.
>
> http://owasp.blogspot.com/2014/01/community.html
>
> For me send a cal invite and will try to always accommodate. I am doodled
> out at this point.
>
> <rant>
> This was the core reason I voted in favor of having a OWASP required face
> to face 2x and travel covered as we push into March with this discussion.
> Emails are good but not very strategic they are a tactical solution. Other
> organizations I am participating in cover panel/board sessions so OWASP
> needs to value the time of it's elected representatives without conflict
> when possible. </rant>
>
> Before we know it AppSecUSA 2014 Sept 19th will be here and working
> backwards that was decided in Nov as a meeting covered by the foundation.
>
> Q1
> March
> Q2
> May
> Q3
> September
> Q4
> Nov
>
> Look like target months to lock things on ASAP to satisfy the (4) meetings
> voted in. Introspective of other opportunities (lascon/defcon/BSides/etc..
> (Non-commercial events) the board meetings should be first order of
> business for the new year and every year.
>
> Thanks for your efforts here.
>
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> I think the other issue here is that we're looking for 3 hours (per
> Michael) and not a smaller timeframe.  Smaller definitely makes this more
> doable.  Here's a chart showing everyone's timezones:
>
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20140223&p1=78&p2=102&p3=103&p4=137&p5=24&p6=179
>
> My $0.02, let's do this in one of these blocks:
>
> *Slot A*
> Dublin: 9 PM - 11 APM
> Hong Kong: 5 AM - 7 AM (Sorry Tobias!)
> Hawaii: 11 AM - 1 PM
> Los Angeles: 1 PM - 3 PM
> Austin: 3 PM - 5 PM
> New York: 4 PM - 6 PM
>
> OR
>
> *Slot B*
> Dublin: 11 PM - 1 AM (Sorry Eoin!)
> Hong Kong: 7 AM - 9 AM
> Hawaii: 1 PM - 3 PM
> Los Angeles: 3 PM - 5 PM
> Austin: 5 PM - 7 PM
> New York: 6 PM - 8 PM
>
> OR
>
> *Slot C*
> Dublin: 6 PM - 8 PM
> Hong Kong: 2 AM - 4 AM (Sorry Tobias!)
> Hawaii: 8 AM - 10 AM
> Los Angeles: 10 AM - 12 PM
> Austin: 12 PM - 2 PM
> New York: 1 PM - 3 PM
>
> OR
>
> *Slot D*
> Dublin: 8 PM - 10 PM
> Hong Kong: 4 AM - 6 AM (Sorry Tobias!)
> Hawaii: 10 AM - 12 PM
> Los Angeles: 12 PM - 2 PM
> Austin: 2 PM - 4 PM
> New York: 3 PM - 5 PM
>
> Jim and Eoin are on opposite sides of the globe which makes this even
> harder.  None of these are ideal, but they seem to be the best 2 hour
> blocks available based on where everyone is located.  Maybe before we work
> on dates, we should just work on time slot.  Let's do this.  Everyone rank
> the slots above (A, B, C, D) in order of preference.  Maybe we can come up
> with one that the majority can agree on?  I'm not sure if there's a better
> way to do it, but am open to any suggestions you guys have.
>
> ~josh
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Eoin Keary <eoinkeary at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20140128/3ff3d73a/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list