[Owasp-board] March Calendar for Board Call

Tue Jan 28 17:59:16 UTC 2014

+1 Tom, right on. We need to take advantage of these times when a good # 
of us are together. I think the current board is gelling organically 
very well. The more facetime we get the more that "gel" will accelerate.

I hear you Tom and I support this.

Aloha,
Jim

On 1/28/14, 7:54 AM, Tom Brennan - OWASP wrote:
> I can adjust fire likely for all of those times if a date is picked 
> ASAP with family/work/personal obligations and other OWASP centric 
> commitments projects/chapter.
>
> There will be a lot of us in town for RSA Circus so the 24th morning 
> (before the OWASP training) could be a working "huddle" too. With a 
> virtual conference for those that need to dial in.  I believe we are 
> also sending our staff so if they can't be virtual how can we expect a 
> board to be..  Regardless a face-to-face will happen with several of 
> us (3) board and the ED in California.
>
> http://owasp.blogspot.com/2014/01/community.html
>
> For me send a cal invite and will try to always accommodate. I am 
> doodled out at this point.
>
> <rant>
> This was the core reason I voted in favor of having a OWASP required 
> face to face 2x and travel covered as we push into March with this 
> discussion. Emails are good but not very strategic they are a tactical 
> solution. Other organizations I am participating in cover panel/board 
> sessions so OWASP needs to value the time of it's elected 
> representatives without conflict when possible. </rant>
>
> Before we know it AppSecUSA 2014 Sept 19th will be here and working 
> backwards that was decided in Nov as a meeting covered by the foundation.
>
> Q1
> March
> Q2
> May
> Q3
> September
> Q4
> Nov
>
> Look like target months to lock things on ASAP to satisfy the (4) 
> meetings voted in. Introspective of other opportunities 
> (lascon/defcon/BSides/etc.. (Non-commercial events) the board meetings 
> should be first order of business for the new year and every year.
>
> Thanks for your efforts here.
>
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org 
> <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>> I think the other issue here is that we're looking for 3 hours (per 
>> Michael) and not a smaller timeframe.  Smaller definitely makes this 
>> more doable. Here's a chart showing everyone's timezones:
>>
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20140223&p1=78&p2=102&p3=103&p4=137&p5=24&p6=179
>>
>> My $0.02, let's do this in one of these blocks:
>>
>> _*Slot A*_
>> Dublin: 9 PM - 11 APM
>> Hong Kong: 5 AM - 7 AM (Sorry Tobias!)
>> Hawaii: 11 AM - 1 PM
>> Los Angeles: 1 PM - 3 PM
>> Austin: 3 PM - 5 PM
>> New York: 4 PM - 6 PM
>>
>> OR
>>
>> _*Slot B*_
>> Dublin: 11 PM - 1 AM (Sorry Eoin!)
>> Hong Kong: 7 AM - 9 AM
>> Hawaii: 1 PM - 3 PM
>> Los Angeles: 3 PM - 5 PM
>> Austin: 5 PM - 7 PM
>> New York: 6 PM - 8 PM
>>
>> OR
>>
>> _*Slot C*_
>> Dublin: 6 PM - 8 PM
>> Hong Kong: 2 AM - 4 AM (Sorry Tobias!)
>> Hawaii: 8 AM - 10 AM
>> Los Angeles: 10 AM - 12 PM
>> Austin: 12 PM - 2 PM
>> New York: 1 PM - 3 PM
>>
>> OR
>>
>> _*Slot D*_
>> Dublin: 8 PM - 10 PM
>> Hong Kong: 4 AM - 6 AM (Sorry Tobias!)
>> Hawaii: 10 AM - 12 PM
>> Los Angeles: 12 PM - 2 PM
>> Austin: 2 PM - 4 PM
>> New York: 3 PM - 5 PM
>>
>> Jim and Eoin are on opposite sides of the globe which makes this even 
>> harder.  None of these are ideal, but they seem to be the best 2 hour 
>> blocks available based on where everyone is located.  Maybe before we 
>> work on dates, we should just work on time slot.  Let's do this.  
>> Everyone rank the slots above (A, B, C, D) in order of preference. 
>> Maybe we can come up with one that the majority can agree on?  I'm 
>> not sure if there's a better way to do it, but am open to any 
>> suggestions you guys have.
>>
>> ~josh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Eoin Keary <eoinkeary at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:eoinkeary at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Lets do it withou Jim. He says little anyways :)
>>     Seriously if I do the 3 march at 3:00pm Dublin time does that help??
>>
>>     Eoin Keary
>>     Owasp Global Board
>>     +353 87 977 2988 <tel:%2B353%2087%20977%202988>
>>
>>
>>     On 28 Jan 2014, at 14:43, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org
>>     <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>>     Putting this back out there.  Do we proceed without Jim on 2/3,
>>>     3/3, 3/5, or 3/6?  Without Eoin on 3/3, 3/4, 3/5, 3/6, or 3/7? 
>>>     If we do so, my gut says that it should not count against them
>>>     as a meeting missed.  Are there any unaccounted for
>>>     "flexibilities" on those dates?  We need to make a decision on
>>>     this ASAP.
>>>
>>>     Sarah, can the operational staff please take this on for a Q2
>>>     meeting now before calendars fill?  Thanks!
>>>
>>>     ~josh
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Josh Sokol
>>>     <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Well, crap.  That kills any chance of getting everyone
>>>         together for March.  I'm not sure what to do here.  Are
>>>         there any "flexibilities" that are unaccounted for?
>>>
>>>         Sarah, it would be wise for a member of our operational
>>>         staff to take this on for a Q2 meeting ASAP as this is a
>>>         sign that calendars fill up fast.
>>>
>>>         ~josh
>>>
>>>
>>>         On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Eoin <eoin.keary at owasp.org
>>>         <mailto:eoin.keary at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Done,
>>>             sorry the initial link you send did not work for me.
>>>             done now.
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 20 January 2014 16:41, Josh Sokol
>>>             <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Gentlemen,
>>>
>>>                 I'm still working on trying to put together ideally
>>>                 two 3 hour calls for Q1.  I have a running Doodle here:
>>>
>>>                 http://www.doodle.com/p8pygdxkcp8w9afd
>>>
>>>                 I have a response from Michael, Jim, and Tobias, but
>>>                 am still _*missing Tom, Fabio, and Eoin*_. Please
>>>                 respond so that we can get something on the
>>>                 calendar. Thank you.
>>>
>>>                 ~josh
>>>
>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>                 Owasp-board mailing list
>>>                 Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>                 <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>                 https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             -- 
>>>             Eoin Keary
>>>             OWASP Member
>>>             https://twitter.com/EoinKeary
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20140128/fd69e580/attachment-0001.html>