[Owasp-board] Apology from Jim Manico
jim.manico at owasp.org
Fri Jan 10 05:27:33 UTC 2014
This is absolutely, positively a FAIR question. When I do "Free OWASP
Training" I really need to be careful about branding. Sure, WhiteHat
gets a tangential benefit when I speak at a conference, but I branded
the presentation as "OWASP" and did not tout WhiteHat when representing
Here is the presentation I delivered at RSA Europe in 2013.
Look at page 2. I did mention I worked for WhiteHat there. That's the
first and only mention of WhiteHat, I believe.
Then look at page 50, Eoin and I used our OWASP email.
Note we also used an OWASP template.
So what do you think, reasonable?
PS: I no longer work for WhiteHat.
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Christian, do you have contacts at the NSA or the ASIS? I bet they have
>> a copy of our conversation since it was an international Skype call.
>> Perhaps they could give us a copy so we could settle this dispute? I
>> don't have a copy since I deleted it as soon as you asked me to delete it.
> I look forward to your disputing your claim that you not representing
> OWASP during RSA i.e.
> But then again if you were honest then you would admit that your
> training course at RSA is solely for the commercial benefit of
> WhiteHat Security.
More information about the Owasp-board