[Owasp-board] Vote Request - OWASP Participation at RSA

Josh Sokol josh.sokol at owasp.org
Tue Jan 7 00:17:16 UTC 2014


Where was it ever stated that we have an offer from BSides?  Several people
suggested it (including myself) but I never saw an invitation from them or
anything to indicate that we had one.
On Jan 6, 2014 6:02 PM, "Eoin Keary" <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:

> I disagree. Why are we obsessed with RSA when we have an alternate venue?
> Why take the risk of damaging the foundation? Bsides has an identical
> offering and no bad vibes.
>
> Eoin Keary
> Owasp Global Board
> +353 87 977 2988
>
>
> On 6 Jan 2014, at 23:44, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
>
> I'm in full agreement as Michael stated.  We should cancel the marketing
> agreement and offer to continue the training without it.
>
> ~josh
> On Jan 6, 2014 4:31 PM, "Michael Coates" <michael.coates at owasp.org> wrote:
>
>> Board,
>>
>> I'd like to request a vote on OWASP's participation at RSA. I've captured
>> my position on the public OWASP thread.
>> http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/2014-January/010647.html
>>
>> Please provide any discussion to the vote or cast your vote. Note that
>> this is a time sensitive issue.
>>
>>
>> My vote request is as follows:
>>
>> OWASP will terminate the co-marketing agreement with RSA for RSA 2014.
>> This may place our training at risk, but if permitted we will still
>> provide the free training at RSA and the OWASP speaking slot.
>>
>> Board Votes:
>> Michael
>> Tom
>> Tobias
>> Fabio
>> Josh
>> Jim
>> Eoin
>>
>>
>>
>> Note: Unrelated to the vote - we can still provide free training at
>> BSides too.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Coates
>> Chair of OWASP Board
>> @_mwc
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20140106/2ad62e0d/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list