[Owasp-board] Fwd: Re: Link from Twitter
tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
Sat Jan 4 22:12:26 UTC 2014
As my comment was somewhat unintended too shy offlist, here again on
list for documentation.
All the best, Tobias
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Owasp-board] Link from Twitter
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 11:29:17 -0800
From: Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org>
To: Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>
CC: Tom Brennan <tomb at owasp.org>, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org>,
Sarah Baso <sarah.baso at owasp.org>, dave wichers
<dave.wichers at owasp.org>, Seba OWASP <seba at owasp.org>, Jim Manico
<jim.manico at owasp.org>, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>, Fabio Cerullo
<fcerullo at owasp.org>
I saw we left the board thread (which is public and archived). Great
response from Tobias and probably should be on the public thread too.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Tobias <tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
<mailto:tobias.gondrom at owasp.org>> wrote:
Eoin et al.,
there are various options:
as you attend RSA as individuals first, feel free to pull out or not.
(IMHO there can be good reasons for either way, although in my eyes
RSA lost quite some credibility due to that.)
However, if you want to release a PR item as OWASP, we should have a
quick discussion about it. Possibly on the governance list. (Just
remembering some of the feedback I received when 8 weeks ago
proposing that OWASP should officially state that people, companies
or governments should not put "backdoors" into software or undermine
the security or crypto of products. - And that was a much more
All the best, Tobias
On 29/12/13 15:23, Tom Brennan - OWASP wrote:
> Updated statement
> On Dec 29, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Tom Brennan - OWASP <tomb at owasp.org
> <mailto:tomb at owasp.org>> wrote:
>> If OWASP gets involved in watchdog activities, protests,
>> political sides could become a slippery slope changing the
>> dynamic of the organization overnight.
>> That could be a personal choice that would likely bring large
>> amounts of press attention to OWASP and you and Jim driving by
>> result more people to look at our Independant unbiased platform
>> and support the mission.
>> If you guys decide to pull out - I would suggest a PR item cc to
>> Bill who did our PR at AppSecUSA for comment.
>> I support pulling out as a statement -- of our independence and
>> or a press release about the training and a statement of why
>> we're not pulling out.
>> On Dec 29, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org
>> <mailto:eoin.keary at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>> Should we proceed with delivering training at RSA given they
>>> supported illegal spying?
>>> Link below is mikkos cancellation.
>>> Download the official Twitter app here
>>> Eoin Keary
>>> Owasp Global Board
>>> +353 87 977 2988 <tel:%2B353%2087%20977%202988>
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board