[Owasp-board] Proposal to Update the Membership Revocation Policy

Tobias tobias.gondrom at owasp.org
Fri Feb 21 19:30:09 UTC 2014


I am fine with both. I.e. I would second the motion.
@Josh & Jim: please put the two proposal texts on the meeting agenda:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/February_24,_2014#New_Business

- unless there are any objections or further discussion changes the text.

Thanks, Tobias




On 21/02/14 14:47, Josh Sokol wrote:
> We may want to add the following as well:
>
> *A revoked member who has not shown full compliance with the OWASP
> Code of Ethics during the period of revocation may, at the discretion
> of the list owner(s), have their mailing list communications moderated
> or rejected without warning.*
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org
> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>     Yes, that's what I had in mind, Josh.
>
>
>     --
>     Jim Manico
>     @Manicode
>     (808) 652-3805 <tel:%28808%29%20652-3805>
>
>     On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:17 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org
>     <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>
>>     I'm open to thoughts on chapter meetings.  That's why I started
>>     the discussion on the leaders list around it.  Sounds like pretty
>>     much everyone supports being able to take action.  A it sits
>>     currently, the Membership Revocation Policy actually allows a
>>     revoked member to attend meetings.  We would need to both axe
>>     that and provide for the ability to ban their presence there as
>>     well.  So, I think your proposal, if I understand correctly is to
>>     remove "A revoked member IS permitted to attend OWASP meetings as
>>     they are open and free by design." and replace it with something
>>     more along the lines of "*A revoked member who has not shown full
>>     compliance with the OWASP Code of Ethics during the period of
>>     revocation may, at the discretion of the Chapter Leader(s), be
>>     asked not to attend their Chapter events.*"  Is that what you're
>>     looking for?
>>
>>
>>     On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org
>>     <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         Can we also apply this to chapter meetings somehow? I think
>>         it's fair to allow meeting/chapter leaders to prohibit
>>         revoked members from attending in special board-approved
>>         situations.
>>
>>         --
>>         Jim Manico
>>         @Manicode
>>         (808) 652-3805 <tel:%28808%29%20652-3805>
>>
>>         On Feb 20, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org
>>         <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>>         Quick correction to the wording:
>>>
>>>         *A revoked member who has not shown full compliance with the
>>>         OWASP Code of Ethics during the period of revocation may, at
>>>         the discretion of the OWASP Board of Directors, have the
>>>         revocation period extended indefinitely.*
>>>
>>>
>>>         On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Michael Coates
>>>         <michael.coates at owasp.org <mailto:michael.coates at owasp.org>>
>>>         wrote:
>>>
>>>             This seems like a natural addition of something that is
>>>             already implied. I second the motion for a vote on this.
>>>
>>>
>>>             --
>>>             Michael Coates
>>>             @_mwc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Josh Sokol
>>>             <josh.sokol at owasp.org <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 I'd like to propose an update to the OWASP
>>>                 Membership Revocation Policy
>>>                 (https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Membership_Revocation). 
>>>                 Specifically, I would like to add another bullet
>>>                 point that says:
>>>
>>>                 *A revoked member who has not shown full compliance
>>>                 with the OWASP Code of Ethics during the period of
>>>                 revocation may, at the discretion of the OWASP Board
>>>                 of Directors, extend the revocation period
>>>                 indefinitely.*
>>>
>>>                 Please discuss.
>>>
>>>                 ~josh
>>>
>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>                 Owasp-board mailing list
>>>                 Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>>                 <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>                 https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Owasp-board mailing list
>>>         Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>         https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20140221/eb8e1944/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list