[Owasp-board] Membership Policy and "Open"
michael.coates at owasp.org
Thu Feb 20 16:24:58 UTC 2014
If the only scenario we are trying to accommodate here is the fact that
there is limited space in a physical building, then I dont think we need to
make any changes to the mission statement.
Free and open does not mean we can somehow accommodate 1000 people in a
small space or else we violate our mission. It means we don't have
artificial requirements on who can and can't attend. Am I missing something
to your concerns jim?
On Feb 20, 2014 7:48 AM, "Josh Sokol" <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
> In addition, the Chapter Leader Handbook (
> says that "As long as the meeting is free and open and doesn't violate
> other OWASP principals, a vendor's office space may be a great location to
> hold a meeting." I'm willing to be there is other material in there as
> well that indicates that meetings should be open to all.
> I'm not sure how I feel about this btw. I completely understand the
> context, but when your entire organization is founded on and preaches the
> concept of being free and open to everyone, changing that is a pretty
> significant change in direction, no matter what the catalyst is.
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>> I would like to revisit our mission statement and membership policy at
>> the next board meeting if not sooner.
>> Our mission statement says "everyone is free to participate in OWASP" (
>> http://www.owasp.org) and the Membership Revocation Policy says "A
>> revoked member IS permitted to attend OWASP meetings as they are open and
>> free by design." (https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Membership_Revocation)
>> I move that we change this. There are situations when OWASP meetings are
>> held at private companies with a limit to how many people can attend, and
>> certain folks wishing to attend may not be allowed to due to that
>> constraint. I would also like to consider changing the membership
>> revocation policy.
>> This is an incredibly difficult issue messing with the core of OWASP. I I
>> could be completely wrong here and ask for your help in this matter.
>> Thank you,
>> Jim Manico
>> OWASP 2x4 Member
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board