[Owasp-board] Jer

Jim Manico jim.manico at owasp.org
Sun Feb 2 12:38:19 UTC 2014


Thanks folks. Fair comments all around on this thread. I think a email 
with details so we have something to chew on is apropos and will pass it 
along.

Aloha,
Jim

> I agree with Tom and am always interested to hear new and good ideas.
>
> Though, just for the record, I like to keep the agenda open for 
> everyone who likes to bring in good ideas and board topics, equally. 
> So I would not want to "promise" a 30min slot at this point without 
> knowing a bit more what it's about. If other topics come up that 
> require time, they should be treated equally.
> Having said that, I would expect that we should have enough time.
>
> Maybe two more things:
> 1. the next board meeting is potentially a bit away, so he is warmly 
> invited to send a quick email with his ideas or specific proposals 
> beforehand (either to the public board-list, or to the board members 
> directly).
> 2. if he or you think the board may need to take urgent actions or 
> votes on this, I would especially appreciate a heads-up before the 
> meeting, so everyone can prepare and we can put the topic on the 
> agenda to make sure we have enough time for it.
>
> Cheers, Tobias
>
>
>
> On 30/01/14 13:48, Tom Brennan - OWASP wrote:
>> Perfect for new business at any board meetings, anyone can "address 
>> the board" on the record formerly.
>>
>> Another reason why posting the dates and times is critical of when 
>> and wear. It's not just the (7) it's for the community to have access
>>
>> Most would agree that a written submission is better for folks to 
>> chew on it before the meeting if it is proposal. If it is a call to 
>> action type of thing we have the process set up here
>>
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Initiatives_Global_Strategic_Focus
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org 
>> <mailto:josh.sokol at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm all for it.  Jeremiah is highly respected in the industry and 
>>> his feedback and assistance with AppSec USA 2012 was extremely 
>>> valuable.
>>>
>>> ~josh
>>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2014 2:04 AM, "Jim Manico" <jim.manico at owasp.org 
>>> <mailto:jim.manico at owasp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Board,
>>>
>>>     Jeremiah Grossman asked Sarah and I if he could speak to the board
>>>     for about 30 minutes with suggestions about expanding the
>>>     industry and
>>>     awareness for AppSec. I of course I worked for him recently and
>>>     have a
>>>     conflict of interest here.
>>>
>>>     But I think what he has to say will benefit everyone in our
>>>     community
>>>     and help us achieve our mission.
>>>
>>>     In fact, we might want to have other "guest speakers" throughout the
>>>     year from members of our community.
>>>
>>>     Is this ok by you?
>>>
>>>     Aloha,
>>>     --
>>>     Jim Manico
>>>     @Manicode
>>>     (808) 652-3805 <tel:%28808%29%20652-3805>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Owasp-board mailing list
>>>     Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>>     https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org <mailto:Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org>
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-board/attachments/20140202/6de252dc/attachment.html>


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list