[Owasp-board] BugCroud

Martin Knobloch martin.knobloch at owasp.org
Tue Dec 23 19:11:59 UTC 2014


‎All,

This sounds very interesting and I am looking forward to see how this will work out.
That said, as I don't like changing rules during the  game, this is not applicable for the upcoming AppSec-Eu. We are to far in proceedings.

Cheers, 
-martin


  Origineel bericht  
Van: Tom Brennan
Verzonden: dinsdag 23 december 2014 05:03
Aan: Eoin Keary
Cc: OWASP Board List
Onderwerp: Re: [Owasp-board] BugCroud

Related more to CFP but this is cool let the attendees pick the agenda

https://www.syscan.org/index.php/sg/cfp/vote/

Now that's transparency 

Tom Brennan
973-202-0122

> On Dec 22, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Eoin Keary <eoin.keary at owasp.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 20 Dec 2014, at 02:07, Michael Coates <michael.coates at owasp.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey Jim
>> 
>> As someone who go is planning appsecusa 2015 here are my thoughts. 
>> 
>> 1. Open call for activities. So bugcrowd and anyone else can submit a proposal for activity x. 
>> 
>> 2. Making it clear that this is an add on activity coordinated by vendor x (e.g along the lines you mentioned if specifically vendor not Owasp)
>> 
>> And don't get me wrong, these companies are all great. But it's about clearly delineating Owasp vs vendor items and making an open playing field for all to submit. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Jim Manico <jim.manico at owasp.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Board,
>>> 
>>> BugCroud has been setting up events at OWASP conferences that concearn me. They are doing "bugbashes" which are CTF's that use the BugCroud closed-source commercial platform. These CTF's go after public websites that have open bug bounties, but still, it uses the BugCroud platform to track these efforts. Since this is a commercial platform, this falls under a vendor sponsorship program as opposed to an event they can host at our conference "for free".
>>> 
>>> So I suggest we charge for vendor sponsorship fees and move the BugBash program to the vendor area so it's clear this is not an official OWASP program.
>>> 
>>> If OWASP wants to do a "public conference" CTF in a more premium area of the conference, I'd like to see us using a platform that is open source like the OWASP CTF project. If a vendor wants to use their commercial platform to do a CTF at an official OWASP conference, that sounds like a vendor sponsorship event/opportunity.
>>> 
>>> Aloha,
>>> Jim
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owasp-board mailing list
>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-board mailing list
> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board
_______________________________________________
Owasp-board mailing list
Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-board


More information about the Owasp-board mailing list