[Owasp-board] [Owasp-leaders] (Projects Reboot 2012) Re: OWASP 2014 - Strategic Goals
dennis.groves at owasp.org
Wed Nov 13 10:58:09 UTC 2013
With all due respect, I genuinely wish such a thing were possible. As I
have stated before, Eoin has many great qualities about him. I
personally supported him in getting project reboot started, and his
willingness to take action where others did not has led to many positive
changes in the community.
However, why would I ever choose to pick up a phone and call somebody
who is so abusive to others?
Eoin is so abusive that you personally had to draft an Anti-Harassment
Policy specifically because of his behavior toward you and your staff
(to say nothing of the volunteers). Eoin also consistently does not give
credit where credit is due; he claims successes for himself. He does not
take responsibility for his actions when things go wrong, rather he
Those maybe great business skills, but OWASP marches to a different
ethical drum. And since all of you agree with me in private, I know you
that you know what I am saying is accurate. And why is that? It is
because you have the same experiences!
I just want Eoin to give credit where credit is due, and stop behaving
poorly to others; two things I believe his consistent patterns of
behavior seem to indicate he is incapable of doing.
Therefore, I fully stand by my statement that a board level position
requires a much higher standard of behavior than Eoin currently
exhibits. Eoin can be a tremendous asset to the community, and I feel
that he should continue to do so as a volunteer.
This is my final public email on the subject, I suggest we all speak
face to face at AppSec.
P.S. Attached email - Evidentially, Eoin disagree's with me and claims
he can spend OWASP foundation money however he chooses, and I rebut.
On 13 Nov 2013, at 1:32, Sarah Baso wrote:
> Thanks Josh.
> I wanted to echo Josh's sentiments and ask that you (Dennis and Eoin)
> continue this conversation offline (if it is necessary).
> I think this back and forth has been a series of poor communication
> lack of communication) and operating on different sets of assumptions.
> a global community that works remotely and communicates via email, we
> need to try hard to pick up the phone where necessary and also I would
> to think we can give our colleagues and peers in OWASP the benefit of
> doubt. I don't think Eoin or anyone else was defrauding OWASP.
> The staff is working hard at setting better policies and financial
> communication methods to help make sure that there isn't ongoing
> about who is getting what money and where guidelines we need to follow
> comply with terms of our grants as well as donor intent. I would like
> see the board not be involved in the day to day management of funds
> forward, but instead directing questions and submitting expense
> (as applicable) per the standard policies set for the organization. I
> think we are getting there....
> On a positive note, just think if this energy of all of us (staff,
> members, and volunteers) was spent working towards our mission instead
> rehashing the same argument in a nonproductive way 10 times!?
> Let's refocus on the strategic goal discussion -- and Eoin, i haven't
> you bring up your cause of Developer Outreach that we discussed in
> I assume you still feel strongly about that specifically being called
> in the goals for the upcoming year? (which i agree with). Are there
> certain metrics you think we could use to measure impact on the
> in this area?
> Executive Director
> OWASP Foundation
> sarah.baso at owasp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Re: [Owasp-board] Ciso project fundin
More information about the Owasp-board