[Owasp-board] Grant Spending and Funding Policy
samantha.groves at owasp.org
Fri Nov 1 00:20:29 UTC 2013
Hi Josh and All,
I think Tobias and Dennis outlined the benefits excellently. While some
individuals/groups do get awarded grants, I would say that grant awarding
organizations are more likely to fund projects attached to a more well
known/established organization. OWASP has a very strong brand presence in
the industry. It certainly helps Project Leaders by giving them a better
chance of winning an award as we have an established track record of
success now with our grant applications.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org> wrote:
> So, to be clear, as an OWASP project leader, if I apply for grant money,
> it's really the Foundation and not me applying for the grant money. The
> grant then goes to the Foundation and the Foundation then plays mediator
> between me (and my milestones) and the granting party. As the middle-man,
> the Foundation is now liable not only for the deliverables, but also the
> grant payments, justifications, etc.
> Just to play devils advocate here, this seems like a liability that we
> don't necessarily have to take on. We can assist project leaders with
> their grants without being the grantee. The grantor can hold them
> personally liable for deliverables, rather than the Foundation. Seems like
> we could easily mitigate some risk here by playing more of an "advisor"
> role in this process rather than owning it. And from the project leader's
> point-of-view we'd be adding value back to them without controlling them.
> Is it possible to have OWASP Projects without having OWASP own the projects?
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Samantha Groves <
> samantha.groves at owasp.org> wrote:
>> Hello Josh,
>> Great question. It is important for the foundation to review and approve
>> all grant proposals as the proposal will be submitted on behalf of the
>> foundation. This will make us liable for the deliverable promised in the
>> proposal. As I am the person responsible for project grants, I will need to
>> review and approve the proposals.
>> I can certainly put together a document that outlines the benefits of
>> running an OWASP Project, as well.
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Josh Sokol <josh.sokol at owasp.org>wrote:
>>> I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but what is the purpose of #1 (requiring
>>> the project managers approval)? Is this so that OWASP can capture the
>>> money up-front? So OWASP controls the branding? The interactions with the
>>> grant agency? As a leader of an open-source project myself, I've
>>> questioned the value of moving it under the OWASP umbrella mostly because I
>>> want to maintain control over my project. With requirements like these, I
>>> start to question the value-add vs overhead of running an "OWASP Project".
>>> Would it make sense to also either include in this document or create a new
>>> one to address all of the positive aspects of becoming an OWASP project? I
>>> think Samantha told me that there's assistance in obtaining grant money.
>>> That seems positive. What else? Any place we put restrictions on people
>>> we should be also calling out the benefits that come along with those.
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Sarah Baso <sarah.baso at owasp.org>wrote:
>>>> Board members -
>>>> Samantha, along with the feedback from the rest of the staff, put
>>>> together some operational guidelines for grant spending:
>>>> These guidelines provide clear expectations of how grant awarded funds
>>>> are to be managed and spent by all OWASP Projects. In addition to being an
>>>> important piece in management of funds, the IRS asks about the
>>>> organization's procedures for monitoring the use of grants (especially
>>>> outside of the US).
>>>> I have added the link to this document to the Governance page as well
>>>> Finally, the staff is working on developing instructions that will
>>>> assist the community on requesting funds from the foundation more broadly
>>>> since I know this is a current point of confusion (and we want it to be
>>>> easy and clear to everyone). So, stay tuned for that piece!
>>>> Sarah Baso
>>>> Executive Director
>>>> OWASP Foundation
>>>> sarah.baso at owasp.org
>>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>>> Owasp-board mailing list
>>> Owasp-board at lists.owasp.org
>> *Samantha Groves, MBA*****
>> *OWASP Projects Manager*
>> The OWASP Foundation
>> Phoenix, USA
>> Email: samantha.groves at owasp.org
>> Skype: samanthahz
>> OWASP Global Projects<https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Project>
>> Book a Meeting with Me <http://goo.gl/mZXdZ>
>> OWASP Contact US Form <http://owasp4.owasp.org/contactus.html>
>> New Project Application Form<https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dHZfWGhHZ0Z4UFFwZU42djBXcVVLSlE6MQ#gid=0>
*Samantha Groves, MBA*****
*OWASP Projects Manager*
The OWASP Foundation
Email: samantha.groves at owasp.org
OWASP Global Projects<https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Project>
Book a Meeting with Me <http://goo.gl/mZXdZ>
OWASP Contact US Form <http://owasp4.owasp.org/contactus.html>
New Project Application
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Owasp-board